Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • “Government Employee” is Not a Synonym for “Saint”

    Posted by David Foster on June 4th, 2014 (All posts by )

    A good piece by Glenn Reynolds at USA Today: Greedy Socialism.

    The reality, of course, is that government employees, be they cabinet officials or low-level clerks, are motivated by the same kinds of desires that motivate people in other walks of life: money, security, power over others, creativity, status, ego-feeding and public adulation, in addition to the satisfactions of doing good work and providing value to others…with the individuals weights of these factors of course varying from person to person. The principal-agent problem does not disappear just because the agent works for the government.

    I particularly like this passage from Glenn’s article:

    The absence of a bottom line doesn’t reduce greed and self-dealing — it removes a constraint on greed and self-dealing. And when that happens, ordinary people pay the price. Keep that in mind, when people suggest that free-market systems are somehow morally inferior to socialism.


    2 Responses to ““Government Employee” is Not a Synonym for “Saint””

    1. Bilwick Says:

      In the immortal words of David Friedman: “Greedy capitalists make money. Virtuous ‘liberals’ steal it.”

    2. Jimmy J. Says:

      What’s rather interesting to me is the huge change that’s occurred in government bureaucrats over my lifetime of 81 years.

      I grew up in Estes Park, Colorado at the east entrance to Rocky Mountain National Park. The town was surrounded by Roosevelt National Forest. The basis of our economy was twofold – the government payroll and summer tourism. There were a lot of National Park and Forest Service personnel living in our village. No one in the Park Service or Forest Service expected to get rich. It was work that outdoor-loving people wanted to do. It offered steady employment and the promise of a pension down the road. Their income was about 25% less than comparable private sector wages because of the security and stable pension the jobs offered.

      I worked three summers for the White Pine Blister Rust Control program. (It helped pay for my college.) There were about one hundred workers in the camp It was very tightly run. Our overall boss worked for the Department of Entymology in the Forest Service. He was always haranguing us about earning our wages and not cheating the tax payers. We always put in a full eight hour day and there were foremen who laid out the work and made sure no one was dogging it. Twice each summer our boss would pick out the least productive worker on the crew and fire him in front of the rest of us. We assembled every morning before loading up in trucks to go out to work. The boss would call out the individual’s name and say, “You’re not cutting it. Pack up your gear and get out of camp.” Very intimidating. All of us wanted that job and such hard nosed policies kept us working hard. Such policies were a result of the Depression where money was tight and jobs hard to come by. They would be seen as much too harsh today.

      That was in the 1950s. Over time that has all changed. I blame public sector unions for a lot of it. However, people seem to have lost touch with the idea that the taxpayer deserves an honest day’s work for their hard earned tax dollars. The gross mismanagement and open greed in the VA is the exact opposite of what government employment was like back in the 50s.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.