Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • “How Cancer Caused World War I”

    Posted by Jonathan on July 1st, 2014 (All posts by )

    Via Michael Kennedy in a comment on another post, this short monograph is worth reading.

    “What if”, or as they call it now, path dependency, is an eternal question. In this case it seems justified.


    3 Responses to ““How Cancer Caused World War I””

    1. David Foster Says:

      Bio of Frederick III, looks interestingüller-ebook/dp/B006JMPQL6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1404219710&sr=8-1&keywords=our+fritz

    2. Subotai Bahadur Says:

      I readily grant that the early death of Frederick III and the elevation of Wilhelm II made the Western Front portion of WW-I inevitable in 1914. However, the Balkans were [and are still today] a tinderbox. I tend to blame the Hapsburg foreign policy actually more than the Germans for the outbreak of the war at that time. They tried to use the assassination to bring the Serbs to heel and went several demands too far for Serbian sovereignty. Which triggered the system of interlocking alliances that brought Russia, France, Germany and England in.

      I think that there still eventually would have been war, revolution, or civil disorder in the Balkans that probably would have started a larger conflict. The question would be whether it would have triggered the alliances. The key would have been whether Russian would have felt it had to jump in to protect its role as defender of all Slavs. It did not in the First and Second Balkan Wars in 1912 and 1913, when the Ottomans were involved.

      Subotai Bahadur

    3. Michael Kennedy Says:

      There was a very good book written a long time ago by Hans Zinser called, Rats, Lice and History , which is still in print since 1935. Plague has also played a major role in history, possibly ending the age of serfdom, at least in England.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.