Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
    Loading
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Envelope Backs

    Posted by Shannon Love on September 17th, 2004 (All posts by )

    From watching the news one could safely assume that Iraq is a nation up in arms and that the situation is spiraling out of control. One could assume from continuing Coalition causalities that opposition to the Coalition is widespread and popular.

    How can we test that idea? Well, we could try a few back-of-the-envelope type calculations to try to get at least a sense of the magnitude of the problem.

    Iraq is a nation of roughly 25,000,000 (twenty-five million)

    If 1% of the population was willing to take up arm against the Coalition, that would mean an active insurgency of 250,000 (two hundred fifty thousand). Thatís roughly 1.5 insurgents for every Coalition soldier in-country.

    If 1% of those insurgents attacked the Coalition on any given day it would mean that 2,500 (twenty-five hundred) insurgents would be attacking every day.

    If 1% of those insurgents managed to kill a Coalition soldier, that would mean Coalitions causalities would run at a rate of 25 (twenty-five) dead a day.

    The Coalition actually loses around 3 killed per day.

    Working from above backwards, that implies that the number of insurgents attacking Coalition per day is around 300 (three hundred).

    That implies that the total active insurgency is comprised of 30,000 (thirty thousand) individuals.

    (Thatís an upper bound by the way)

    That means that the percentage of the Iraqi population actively resisting the Coalition is somewhere around 0.12%

    Wow, were obviously doomed. Time to throw in the towel I say.

     

    4 Responses to “Envelope Backs”

    1. Ron Michaels Says:

      You can’t use math arguments to convince Liberals. They don’t respond well to Right and Wrong answers – Good or Evil – Winners or Losers.

    2. peter Says:

      Well done, but again this is a nice exemple of self dellusion not to say dishonesty.

      How many algerian insurgents where fighting the French ?
      The Big difference between these two war is the gap in military equipments.

    3. Sandy P Says:

      LGF has a couple of good links, see Belmont Club.

    4. Han Silo Says:

      I guess the post begs a couple of questions: how many insurgents does it take to stop the US led occupation in Iraq? What constitutes an insurgent or member of the insurgency? Does every member of an insurgency bear arms? Although the mathematical analysis is somewhat provocative, insightful. I believe that it simplifies the Iraqi question a great deal. At any rate, I still agree with you to a certain extent — the coalition must succeed . . .