Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Rolling In It

    Posted by James R. Rummel on April 26th, 2005 (All posts by )

    I was just reading this news item, which discusses the provisions that various emergency agencies have set up in order to take care of animals during disasters.

    This is certainly nothing new, and itís eminently practical since livestock are a major form of agricultural assets. Protecting farm animals against needless death is a way for the state governments to protect their tax base.

    But people are taking steps beyond moving cows or horses out of harms way. Emergency shelters for people are now preparing to meet the needs of pets as well as their owners.

    Megan McArdle says that itís very difficult to declare yourself wealthy because the goalposts keep retreating as you move up the income ladder. Thatís certainly true, but I think that Iíve found an indicator of the relative wealth of the nation as a whole.

     

    5 Responses to “Rolling In It”

    1. incognito Says:

      Ha, good one. Look at EU, they have time to legislate that every pig kept as livestock must have access to meaningful entertainment… Somehow I don’t think that law would go far in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America.

    2. Shannon Love Says:

      It is a good indicator of wealth that your average individual can now go through life without personally ever killing a warm blooded animal. People used to have to kill animals continually either because they were pest or for food. We don’t even have to euthanize our own pets.

      I am reminded of a fake news story in The Onion years back comparing the medical care available to a dog in United States versus a human in sub-Saharan Africa. The dog gets a CAT scan (ha ha) and artificial hip replacements while the African gets his gangrenous limb cut off by his bother-in-law using a carpentry saw. It was so horribly, horribly true that one had to either weep or laugh uproariously.

      The fact that our economically valueless house pets receive better medical care than most of the humans in the world is the true indicator of our wealth.

    3. David Mercer Says:

      Yes, I have lavished medical care upon pets in the past, more than on myself in some fiscal years…but I’m now a poor ‘returning student’ and if the kitties get sick…well food for us walking apes is hard enough to come by now, so you fill in the rest.

      The decadence level of keeping small, semi-tamed carnivores for our amusment strikes me as almost Melnibonean (sorry, fantasy reference!)

    4. incognito Says:

      LOL on that one. Irreverantly pithy as always Shannon.

    5. voluntaryXchange Says:

      Are We Rich Yet?

      It’s time to give up any pretense that America – as a country – is not rich. If our disaster plans need to include provisions for pets, we are rich. QED. Via the Chicago Boyz post entitled