Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Seth Barrett Tillman: Free Speech in Andrew McCabe’s America: A Post on Conlawprof

    Posted by Jonathan on February 19th, 2019 (All posts by )

    Important points:

    In his 60 Minutes interview, former acting FBI director McCabe said:

    There were a number of things that caused us to believe that we had adequate predication or adequate reason and facts, to open the investigation. The president had been speaking in a derogatory way about our investigative efforts for weeks, describing it as a witch hunt… publicly undermining the effort of the investigation.

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/thoughts-andrew-mccabes-60-minutes-interview (emphasis added).
     
    Is not this statement troubling, if not Orwellian? Think or speak the wrong thing—and the government investigates you? In a 2017 blog post on New Reform Club, I wrote about this issue as follows:

    Read Seth’s full post.

     

    8 Responses to “Seth Barrett Tillman: Free Speech in Andrew McCabe’s America: A Post on Conlawprof

    1. Mike K Says:

      I just read his post. Well done.

    2. Anonymous Says:

      Ditto.

      Death6

    3. Brian Says:

      Try asking a Democrat why they are fine with the FBI going after Trump like this, given history like them spying on MLK, etc. They’ll say, well, he wasn’t a Russian agent, but Trump is. It’s the most amazing thing how completely insane the country has gone.

    4. Jonathan Says:

      A common theme from the days of Hoover through today is unaccountability, political corruption and ineptitude at the highest levels of the FBI. Most lower-level employees are probably conscientious but the leaders stink. I still think W Bush missed a major opportunity by not firing the FBI and CIA leadership after 9/11.

    5. billrla Says:

      Next time someone tries to overthrow a duly elected president, I recommend having the book, movie and action figures all ready to go, right from the start, plus exclusive distribution deals with Walmart, Barnes & Noble and a major theater chain (one that also serves food and drinks). Having to wait for all the coup plotters to publish their books, one at a time, has been very frustrating. And I want my Andrew McCabe Action Figure.

    6. Jonathan Says:

      I’m still waiting for the Mark Felt action figure.

    7. Bill Brandt Says:

      There is an excellent op-ed in today’s WSJ on this. They really laid it out – the FBIs top people – succinctly and said why this is so troubling. For the top leadership to sit and plot how, using the 25th amendment, removing a sitting President is very troubling. Comey’s exoneration Hillary and her email scandal was outside Justice Dept rules, and then to insulate himself against a Congressional investigation, reinstates the investigation 11 days before the election. The WSJ opines that this cost her the election.

      All rotten at the top, but I would agree with Jonathon that your average field agent is ethical and probably shocked at the rot at the top.

      [Paywall] https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fbis-trump-panic-11550508578?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=3

    8. Phil Ossiferz Stone Says:

      >I would agree with Jonathon that your average field agent is ethical and probably shocked at the rot at the top.

      Then you’re a damned fool. There have been zero whistleblowers, zero resignations. Zilch. None.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.