Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Quote of the Day: Andrew Breitbart

    Posted by Lexington Green on March 1st, 2012 (All posts by )

    [O]ur culture is the most important front. And the three most important pillars of that culture are Hollywood and pop culture, along with education and the media. Those three are absolutely controlled by the left.

    RIP

    We must recapture or replace the “commanding heights” of the culture.

    It is long overdue. The Right-O-Sphere is but a first step.

    Otherwise, merely political gains will be built on sand.

    Be happy.

    Fear God and dread nought.

    It can be done.

    UPDATE:

    Also this:

    Family is what motivated Andrew. I know someone must have known him without Susie, but not I. It has always seemed to me like they have been together forever. He dedicated his most recent book to his kids, writing: “Too many people fought to create this country” for us “to squander it in a generation. . . . I cannot stand on the sidelines as you and your generation are being handed the tab.”

    From K-Lo at the Corner. RTWT.

     

    4 Responses to “Quote of the Day: Andrew Breitbart”

    1. Sgt. Mom Says:

      In a small way, I’m doing my best with my books. Along about 2004, I started to have this absolute conviction that as Americans, we needed to reclaim our history, our memories of the past, and I began to think that by writing stories abouts that past would help. I am afraid that most people seem to learn history through the medium of popular culture.

      I began to believe that if I could make a ripping good yarn out of something like my first book, To Truckee’s Trail, I could remind people that most of our metaphorical ancestor-Americans were good, well-meaning and decent people in challenging times. Perhaps I could make a start at claiming back some ground for us. We have to have some kind of honor to believe in, we have to know what the people who founded and built America stood for, what they valued, why they acted as they did. To not know our history is to live in a kind of cultural sensory-deprivation tank. And it’s even worse to believe that our metaphorical American ancestors were nothing but a bunch of unrelieved no-goodnicks. To believe that is a kind of cultural suicide.

      So that is the ground that I am fighting for – our cultural memory.

    2. Michael Kennedy Says:

      I did something like that with my history of medicine. We now have a world where the American College of Physicians
      has revised the code of ethics to include something called “Parsimonious Care.” That means a quality of care that you wouldn’t want for your family or yourself but it will save money and fit well with Obamacare. The book is still selling well on Amazon 8 years after I self published it. No university press was interested. It couldn’t be less PC and I have frankly been surprised by the people who agreed with me. As an example of my Breitbart-like opinions, I think Freud was a scam on the order of global warming. Maybe I should write another book. I actually have one in manuscript.

    3. onparkstreet Says:

      I am very sorry for his family. RIP.

      – Madhu

    4. Anonymous Says:

      Breitbart’s death came as a shock – not because I’d followed him closely, not only because he was only 43, not only because it was clearly so sudden. It came as a shock because he seemed, well, life in motion. Roger Simon’s headline – “A Whirlwind Dies” – that was the feeling. I’d delighted in how he’d played the media in the Acorn scandals, delighted in the energy and apparent humor he took to the ramparts, noticed the way he was maligned and how he triumphed through transparency – and how others feared that clarity. But he seemed to be having fun. And, well, I’d taken him for granted. How often I take for granted the people and insights of those who delight me. And, then, pouf, he was gone.

      But the strength of his argument lies in the response – “we are all Breitbarts now.” Sgt Mom’s and Michael Kennedy’s response was to describe action. Theirs was positive action. That is what Breitbart advocated. That is what the Tea Party advocates. Here is Breitbart’s epiphany in Righteous Indignation:
      But along with these realizations came another realization. I began to see the fundamental flaw in the left’s scorched-earth tactics – they can only tear down, not build up. And it hit me that the tearing down of The Other wasn’t enough. Every time I did a Fox News hit where I attacked Michael Moore, no matter how valid the attack, no matter how much I had raised my fledgling Q rating, I felt emasculated and cheapened because I was only tearing down, not building. I felt the inherent lack that resides in the right, which was so removed from the cultural process because it had self-removed, abdicated its responsibility to be a steward of the culture, handed over the entire means of representing the United States abroad and teaching Americans about America at home to the hard left.
      The Tea Party is abuilding and so are the other projects he touched. It isn’t what we don’t like (and there is plenty of that in the present administration), it is what we do like that will define us, and be an appropriate legacy to a man who did die young.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.