Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • So you think your politics is bad

    Posted by Helen on February 15th, 2013 (All posts by )

    You guys should come to Britain. Then you would know what bad and stupid politics was. Have you heard of the doctor who was on the list of the Conservative (please note) parliamentary candidates but was suspended because she retweeted a picture of Hitler with a quotation of his in which he explained that the Nazi party was a socialist party? No? Well, here we are. Enjoy.


    8 Responses to “So you think your politics is bad”

    1. Mike K Says:

      I’m reading Conrad Black’s story of his encounter with US, British and Canadian legal systems. He was also fiercely attacked by the Murdoch media in London but, of course, they were rivals. His harshest words are reserved for the US legal and regulatory (Sarbox) systems. The story is simply amazing but his other works are excellent and historically accurate. Boris Johnson, an acquaintance of his, figures in the story.

      Not even politics can be worse than what he went through.

    2. Jonathan Says:

      This is nothing like as shocking as the fact that Marco Rubio drank water while giving a speech. Now that is shocking, though as in your Frosh case none of the people who are shocked can explain why.

    3. David Foster Says:

      Joseph Goebbels, writing in 1932 (when the Nazis were not yet in power) explains the three tenets of National Socialism very clearly, here.

    4. David Foster Says:

      Correction: the Goebbels statement was originally written in 1929; the 1932 reference was to a later version of the pamphlet in which it appeared.

    5. ErisGuy Says:

      Doctor mistakes labels for reality. Not a good trait in a doctor. Apparently the doc missed the Newsweek cover “We Are All Socialists Now,” and it isn’t acceptable to insult even that quasi-heretic of socialism, Mr. Hilter.

    6. A6 Says:

      Wait a tick.

      I bow to no man in my hatred for National Socialism. But:

      Am I to understand that you think the National Socialist German Workers Party was *not* a socialist party?

      Perhaps I misunderstand you, but you seem to suggest the doctor thought the Nazi party was a *good* party. That is implausible.

      Over on this side of the pond, and a fortiori in the Chicago Boyz blog, we don’t use “socialist” as a synonym for “good”. Likely your doctor friend didn’t either.

      When Hitler confessed his party was socialist, he gave away much of the game.

      Not all of the game, of course: not (in that remark) the prison camps and Judenhaas and mass murders and so on. Not every socialist system has those features.

    7. Mike K Says:

      Not every socialist system has “Judenhaas” but the history of socialist systems has always revealed a trend to authoritarian behavior as the proletariat resists the wishes of their masters.

      Adam Smith understood human nature better than Karl Marx.

    8. VSSC Says:

      Speaking of bad socialist politics and resistance…

      Awhile ago here someone who claimed to be a voter observer Nov 2012 election observed the Meso-American diaspora reached to unlikely places as the Balkans, the Middle East, and Vietnam..

      Now. That Blue needs to get the vote out and will do whatever it takes is a given, but the mechanism is interesting.

      I ask your indulgence to mate metaphors..

      For this is a peculiar mold to be growing on this dish..with the possible exception of the Balkans…if there were mold at all, it should be Red and not Blue mold.

      For all of those places we have had conflict.

      So what is happening?

      If one were to think of purloined votes as gems..not rare but valuable..why conflict gems…our conflicts..?

      The pentagon is not a natural Blue voting machine.

      It’s not core to the question of our politics..but it’s most interesting as to WHY is THAT mold growing on THOSE dishes?

      How is this happening…the mechanics? things out of place being pursued can lead to the most fascinating and useful discoveries.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.