Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • How to stop the Executive from running out the scandal clock

    Posted by TM Lutas on July 18th, 2013 (All posts by )

    This Politico story on Benghazi led me to consider the question of what would need to be in place to stop the “we need you to stop talking about this until everyone forgets” strategy.

    Early on while everybody is still upset in the first flush of outrage, the executive branch needs to give a time estimate of how long it is going to take to get to the bottom of it all and once they blow that deadline, a critical mass of ordinary people need to have that come up as sort of a reminder. The blowing of the deadline should be its own, separate scandal. Congress should organize hearings at the deadline so that when the administration blows it, they can get as much information as has been learned since then, monitor the resources and energy placed in the scandal to determine if they’re slow walking the thing, and get a better date.


    6 Responses to “How to stop the Executive from running out the scandal clock”

    1. Frankenstein Government Says:

      That has always been his strategy. Hijack the current scandal with something else knowing the complicit media will give him a pass.

      I have said this many times. Obama could run over a family of four in the crosswalk= and the discussion would be those idiot pedestrians and what in the hell were they doing in the crosswalk?

    2. Sgt. Mom Says:

      I’m as baffled as you are, by the way that the lapdog media gives him cover, over and over and over again. I think one of the regular commenters that I see at Belmont Club (and a couple of other places on the CB blogroll) has adopted the drip-drip-drip method. All comments are ended with “Remember Benghazi!” Sort of like Cato the Elder – and “Carthage must be destroyed.”
      Maybe we have to keep pounding away on it, in every arena – to the point of being tiresome.

    3. Mrs. Davis Says:

      There probably won’t be much talking about this in the media till January of 2016.

    4. TMLutas Says:

      I don’t even mind (so much) their pimping for Obama if we get reforms out of it so it never happens again. I fear that we won’t. The large majority of voters have computing power sufficient to keep track of more scandals than the politicians have the capacity to create so why don’t we have software to do that job?

    5. PenGun Says:

      It’s not a scandal. Well for the right wing, it’s part of their politics as warfare schtick. An extremely stupid thing to do in the first place.

      See children … POLITICS … WARFARE … not the same … wanders off muttering.

    6. Mike K Says:

      Which of the scandals is not a scandal, PenGun ? Or do you know. Just that knee jerking.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.