Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Ivan Aivazovsky, naval painter

    Posted by Ralf Goergens on August 25th, 2013 (All posts by )

    Ivan Aivazovsky (1817 – 1900) was in his time famous around the world, and deservedly so.

    This picture is about the Battle of Navarino in 1827. There are others at the Wikipedia page on Aivazovsky and a lot more at Wikimedia Commons.


    6 Responses to “Ivan Aivazovsky, naval painter”

    1. Roy Says:

      I wonder what would happen if the stories linked to the Battle of Navarino were even loosely known among U.S. voters. How would “dialogue” change with the recognition of the existence of concepts such as dhimi (non-citizen = instantly revocable rights servanthood of all not Muslim), jizya (arbitrary tax rates on all not Muslim), devsumi (1/5 of infant male children of non-Muslims snatched from families to become brain-washed military arm)?

      Ironies abound.

      One military irony: The Muslim siege of Vienna about a century and half before Navarino would have succeeded (and Europe probably become Muslim) had the Muslim military engineers not failed to cope with mud. The Muslim army had cannon which Vienna did not. Wasn’t chivalrous (yet, heh) to use cannon. But the transport of the Muslim cannon faltered because of mud. (Logistics observation common to another thread at Chicagoboyz). Then, ironically, at Navarino the forces joined against the Muslim alliance at Navarino had the better cannon. The Muslim forces not only had not improved their once decisive monopoly, the cannon they had were second-hand gotten from the (at this battle) enemies who had improved their own armament.

    2. Roy Says:

      Oops. What I had in mind was not the Battle of Vienna (Muslim attack in 1683), but the Siege of Vienna (Muslim attack in 1529). Means not century an half, but three centuries before Navarino.

    3. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Thanks, Roy!

      Three centuries makes sense, there is a lot of ruin in an empire, and it took that long for the Turkish Empire to stagnate fatally.

    4. Michael Hiteshew Says:

      “there is a lot of ruin in an empire, and it took that long for the Turkish Empire to stagnate fatally.”
      I wonder how long the USA has?

    5. Lexington Green Says:

      The Turkish Empire never stagnated fatally. It was attacked by three great powers, fought very hard, and only ended because of external attack. If the Ottomans had cut a deal with the Entente powers, it might still exist.

    6. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Thanks for the picture, Michael. I don’t think that the USA has ever been stagnating, when compared to any other country, though.

      Well, the term ‘fatally’ might be inappropriate, Lex. On the other hand, it wasn’t a first-rate power anymore. It was on the defensive and declining in . I think that somebody would ended it sooner or later, if not the Entente, then somebody else.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.