Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Sad Turtle

    Posted by Jonathan on October 9th, 2013 (All posts by )

    Maybe he looks like that because Obama’s park rangers wouldn’t let him back in the park. Or maybe he’s undergoing a colonoscopy. It’s hard to know.

    Side view of the head and forebody of a Florida Softshell Turtle (Apalone ferox) on dry pavement in the Shark Valley section of Everglades National Park, Florida. (Jonathan Gewirtz


    8 Responses to “Sad Turtle”

    1. MikeK Says:

      They turned off his water fountain. The Park Service, that is.

    2. Michael Hiteshew Says:

      On that note…

      This is a good argument for breaking up the National Parks Service. The parks should be distributed to the care of the states in which they reside. The NPS and the Federalies have demonstrated they can’t be trusted to administer the American people’s inheritance with fairness and wisdom. They have forfeited their claim as administrators. Close them down. It will also serve as a warning to future government agencies what the wages of participating in tyranny against their own people will be.

    3. Sgt. Mom Says:

      What Mike H. said. Turn it back to the states where they are, to administer. There are only a handful of national parks in Texas – most of the nice ones are state parks, and they do very well. I did a post for one of my local blog employers this last weekend, about our trek down the Mission Reach of the San Antonio (Extended Riverwalk) — basically a city park. (Which they have lavished a good deal of our tax money on, which I do not regret a single penny of, BTW.) The local realtor who pays me for producing blog content jestingly asked if I had run into any Barrycades along the way, since a couple of the historic missions which the river park connects are indeed, federal parks. I hadn’t, of course – we didn’t hike that far. The thing is – the two missions involved are also active neighborhood churches under authority of the local diocese.
      Should King Barry and his NPS minions try and shut them down … the battle will be positively epic.
      I’ll make popcorn.

    4. Jezzy Says:

      See my moms the nice one…I’m inclined to be more of an anarchist in regards to what I would do if I can across some barrycades in my fair city…..I find the nearest VA Hall, grab a retired SeaBee and have the barrycade welded shut around a NPS vehicle. Or if they were cones I would just buy some gorilla glue and start gluing cones to NPS cars. My mother really is the nicer one…she’d post my bail.

    5. grey eagle Says:

      The time has come to eliminate the national park service, to terminate all the employees with extreme prejudice and sell off the parks. Further we need a constitutional amendment prohibitting the Federal government from owning land.

      My people are upset.

    6. TM Lutas Says:

      The reason that these parks got transferred to the federal government in the first place is because the previous private entities or states were mishandling the parks in various ways and the feds were considered a more competent management option. Now that is out the window so perhaps what should be done is to set up a sort of competition, legislation that facilitates state, federal, or private management whenever present management fouls up. Sorting out what is the relevant electorate would be an interesting exercise and what percentage of that would be necessary for a successful petition but that’s certainly within the realm of the possible.

      Parks shifting from state to federal control would be a sign of bad governance in a state and having them shift en masse back would be a big black mark on the reputation of the federal government. Now if parks go private, that would really be interesting times.

    7. Subotai Bahadur Says:

      Jezzy Says:
      October 9th, 2013 at 7:28 pm

      Access to retired SeaBees and/or welding equipment may not be convenient. However yesterday I read a post to the effect that there are orange traffic cones available everywhere [for purchase at department and hardware stores, not theft]. Simon Jester might be inclined to place them in inconvenient [to the Federales] places with appropriate signage. Bad Simon. Bad, bad Simon.

      Subotai Bahadur

    8. Sgt. Mom Says:

      Well, he could be going through TSA security for a trip to DC.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.