Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
    Email *
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Worthwhile Visiting

    Posted by David Foster on April 15th, 2017 (All posts by )

    The National Museum of Industrial History is located on the site of the former Bethlehem Steel complex.  Most of the original buildings are derelict or partly torn-down, but the above array of blast furnaces and supporting equipment has been preserved.

    Suggested musical accompaniment for a visit to the place that was Bethlehem Steel…features a different company and a slightly different geography, but basically the same sad story.


    16 Responses to “Worthwhile Visiting”

    1. Whitehall Says:

      The creative destruction of capitalism at work.

      I too enjoy visiting historic industrial sites. The iron works in Saugus showed how the early Yankees did it until the British put an end to it by enforcing their monopoly.

    2. David Foster Says:

      Lots of reasons for the failure, only some of which IMO come under the heading of creative destruction….Part of it was market/technology shifting to more steel from scrap, rather than from iron ore…although the industry’s production from ore remains pretty substantial. Part of it was Bethlehem’s unwillingness to move rapidly into new technologies such as continuous casting. Part of it was management which seems to have been almost deliberately out of touch (a separate elevator for the CEO). Part of it was rigid union work rules, and part of it was making promises about future benefits without properly funding or accounting for these. And part of it was foreign imports, the pricing of which was in some cases subsidized by governments. Possibly overly-aggressive environmental regulaltions played a part as well.

      An article about the failure at Fortune, which was once a much better magazine than it is today.

    3. dearieme Says:

      “a separate elevator for the CEO”: if I were a shareholder and found out about that, I’d sell immediately.

    4. David Foster Says:

      Dearieme….I agree.

    5. David Foster Says:

      Re the Saugus Iron Works, when I visited it there was a woman in colonial dress cooking up a storm. It looked and smelled really good. She said her hobby was colonial cookery, and she had previously given samples to visitors (for free, I think), but was no longer allowed to do this on account of some regulation or other.

      I believe it was Margaret who observed that the phrase “it’s a free country” is not in common use in America anymore. Things like this are one reason why.

    6. David Foster Says:

      Re the separate-elevator thing: There was an article several years back about a new approach to elevator controls. The idea is that you select your floor before you get on the elevator, rather than after, thereby allowing the system to dispatch elevators more intelligently–a 30% reduction in average trip time is claimed. Some vendors are also linking the elevator controls (for office buildings) to employee identification cards, so the system knows automatically where the individual wants to button-pushing required. (The advantage here is that the elevator system can keep track of exactly how many people are going where, allowing it to better manage its capacity.)

      What struck me was this quote from an installation director at Schindler:

      “Say I’m a VIP, and I really don’t want to ride with anybody else…So when I swipe my card, the system assigns me an elevator with nobody in it, and that elevator gives me an express trip to my floor.”

      Dear Schindler: Please publish a nice set of customer case studies with the names of companies using this feature prominently displayed. That way, I can be sure to avoid taking long positions in any of them.

    7. Jonathan Says:

    8. David Foster Says:

      24 acres and $120 million? How many employees did Borland have at their peak, anyhow? Surely not enough to justify something like this…

    9. JaimeRoberto Says:

      The Bethlehem Steel headquarters was built in the shape of a cross in order to maximize the number of corner offices. It seems they were more interested in cushy offices than running a business.

    10. Jonathan Says:

      IIRC, Borland made a PR fuss about its opulent new offices shortly before the company started to decline.

    11. Bill Brandt Says:

      Borland is a case study of taking their eye off the ball – they got their start with cheap but decent compilers in the DOS days – grew from nothing to big player overnight and at their height had a family of compilers. Then they seemed to disappear overnight. Phillipe Kahn was the founder and CEO I believe.

      On elevators for CEOs I was reminded of Intel where even the CEO just works in a cubical – or did.

      Our car club has had 2 tours of the Tesla factory in Fremont, and right in the center of the factory floor is a group of about 30-50 desks – including one for Elon Musk. No layers of bureaucracy between what is happening on the factory floor and the CEO.

    12. Mike K Says:

      I think Phillipe Kahn got more interested in sailing at some point. They also had a very good spreadsheet program that I used for years.

      It was called “Quattro pro.”

    13. Mike K Says:

      “a group of about 30-50 desks – including one for Elon Musk. No layers of bureaucracy between what is happening on the factory floor and the CEO.”

      Maybe he learned from Toyota,.

    14. dearieme Says:

      “Say I’m a VIP, and I really don’t want to ride with anybody else…”: ah, the difference between an aristocracy and a nobility.

    15. Bill Brandt Says:

      “Maybe he learned from Toyota,.”

      They didn’t give regular public tours there but occasionally if you were polite and persistent – and were in a car club – someone would accommodate you. In in the talk the guide (really a regular Tesla employee) was saying how horrible the plant was under GM – and their partnership with Toyota turned it around. They actually had drug dealers and prostitutes roaming the factory floor under the GM days, and that plant produced the highest number of warranty claims.

    16. Mike K Says:

      “under the GM days, and that plant produced the highest number of warranty claims.”

      The book, “Crash Course” is really worth reading. It explains how the company tried to institute a “quality circles” culture at the plant that made Saturns. The UAW vetoed it under the UAW president Yokich and the GM middle management were not much more help. The UAW country club, however, was not touched.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.