Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
    Loading
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • How (and How Not) to Sell AOL

    Posted by Jonathan on November 16th, 2005 (All posts by )

    There’s been speculative discussion for a while about whether Time Warner would sell AOL to Google or Microsoft or someone else. I think a spinoff would make more sense for Time Warner.

    Whatever AOL’s value as a business, if TWX wants to unload it to a single bidder it may be difficult to get full value. If you were Microsoft or Google and had a pile of cash, and AOL were worth $X billion by your calculation, would you bid X? I don’t think so. The rational thing, if you are one of a few bidders and everyone knows that the seller is eager to sell, is to bid low, perhaps at a level where you can’t go wrong if your bid is accepted. I suspect that that amount is significantly less than the total value TWX shareholders would gain via a well managed public offering.

    After all, Time Warner is the company that bought AOL near the top. Wouldn’t you also expect them to puke it out near the bottom? That’s the course that this kind of corporate acquisition tends to take. Microsoft and Google know that too, and I doubt that they will be willing to do the deal without getting a big enough edge to make this trade an instant winner. TWX is fighting the tides if it thinks it will get a good price by selling AOL to a cash-rich corporate savior.

    EGG-ON-FACE UPDATE: A commenter reminds me that it was AOL that bought Time Warner, a transaction that reflected very well on AOL’s Steve Case, who used inflated AOL stock to pay for it, and not so well on Time Warner’s then-management (but not its current management).

     

    2 Responses to “How (and How Not) to Sell AOL”

    1. John Kuran Says:

      Actually, it was AOL under Steve Case that bought Time Warner. After Gerald Levin was let go for agreeing to it, AOL was folded under AOL-Time Warner as a division and the name was then changed to Time Warner.

      I’ve got to say that Steve Case got the best bang for the buck for his shareholders because if AOL had not bought Time Warner, chances are AOL’s stock would have collapse in the bursting of the internet bubble.

    2. John Jenkins Says:

      That just solidifies the uselessness of the Time management. Anyone remember the Time-Paramount-Warner Bros. triangle that spawned its own set of litigation (and remains immortalized in securities and corporations texts everywhere)?