"Restore(s) a little sanity into current political debate" - Kenneth Minogue, TLS "Projects a more expansive and optimistic future for Americans than (the analysis of) Huntington" - James R. Kurth, National Interest "One of (the) most important books I have read in recent years" - Lexington Green
Chicago Boyz is a member of the Amazon Associates, B&H Photo, Ammo.com and other affiliate programs. Your purchases made after clicking those businesses' links help to support this blog.
Some Chicago Boyz advertisers may themselves be members of the Amazon Associates and/or other affiliate programs and benefit from any relevant purchases you make after you click on an Amazon or other link on their ad on Chicago Boyz or on their own web sites.
Chicago Boyz occasionally accepts direct paid advertising for goods or services that in the opinion of Chicago Boyz management would benefit the readers of this blog. Please direct any inquiries to
Chicago Boyz is a registered trademark of Chicago Boyz Media, LLC. All original content on the Chicago Boyz web site is copyright 2001-2021 by Chicago Boyz Media, LLC or the Chicago Boyz contributor who posted it. All rights reserved.
This entry was posted on Friday, August 12th, 2016 at 8:50 am and is filed under Europe, Immigration, Trump.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
I went to hear Enoch speak in my university union. He was magnetic. But even more impressive was how he handled questions. We were a clever, cocky lot, but he soon impressed us. Someone would ask a question. Enoch would rephrase it, making it shorter and clearer. He would ask the lad whether that was indeed his point; the lad would assent. Then Enoch would answer it. Not dodge it; not attempt to ingratiate himself with the audience; he would answer it. And if his answer first required that he paint in some background, he did that too. The whole thing was a mixture of a public lecture and a series of high grade tutorials.
He was head-and-shoulders more impressive than any other speaker we had that term, including Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. In fact, head-and-shoulders more impressive than any other political speaker I’ve ever heard. I thought he perhaps lacked a certain human dimension, but intellectually he was the real McCoy. And all done with an old-fashioned formal courtesy.
August 12th, 2016 at 9:16 am
I went to hear Enoch speak in my university union. He was magnetic. But even more impressive was how he handled questions. We were a clever, cocky lot, but he soon impressed us. Someone would ask a question. Enoch would rephrase it, making it shorter and clearer. He would ask the lad whether that was indeed his point; the lad would assent. Then Enoch would answer it. Not dodge it; not attempt to ingratiate himself with the audience; he would answer it. And if his answer first required that he paint in some background, he did that too. The whole thing was a mixture of a public lecture and a series of high grade tutorials.
He was head-and-shoulders more impressive than any other speaker we had that term, including Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. In fact, head-and-shoulders more impressive than any other political speaker I’ve ever heard. I thought he perhaps lacked a certain human dimension, but intellectually he was the real McCoy. And all done with an old-fashioned formal courtesy.
What a waste.