"Restore(s) a little sanity into current political debate" - Kenneth Minogue, TLS "Projects a more expansive and optimistic future for Americans than (the analysis of) Huntington" - James R. Kurth, National Interest "One of (the) most important books I have read in recent years" - Lexington Green
Chicago Boyz is a member of the Amazon Associates, B&H Photo, Ammo.com and other affiliate programs. Your purchases made after clicking those businesses' links help to support this blog.
Some Chicago Boyz advertisers may themselves be members of the Amazon Associates and/or other affiliate programs and benefit from any relevant purchases you make after you click on an Amazon or other link on their ad on Chicago Boyz or on their own web sites.
Chicago Boyz occasionally accepts direct paid advertising for goods or services that in the opinion of Chicago Boyz management would benefit the readers of this blog. Please direct any inquiries to
Chicago Boyz is a registered trademark of Chicago Boyz Media, LLC. All original content on the Chicago Boyz web site is copyright 2001-2021 by Chicago Boyz Media, LLC or the Chicago Boyz contributor who posted it. All rights reserved.
Posted by Jonathan on January 23rd, 2008 (All posts by Jonathan)
(Click image for larger.)
This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008 at 1:42 am and is filed under Photos.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
I would guess that the two pairs of parallel streaks (one tanish, one dark-brownish) that the women appear to be looking at, are the dogs – moving so very fast that they appear as as a blurr.
I still don’t see anything. Now, I am getting older, but I do have a 19in. 1280×1024 Samsung monitor. Maybe if you put up a higher definition jpg. Even the enlarged version is only 85 KB. Or maybe its just all the years that Rummel and I have spent in Central Ohio.
It might be your monitor but I think it’s probably the way you are looking. It would have been clearer without the wet areas on the patio. Look closely and you will see the dogs and their shadows.
I too can’t see no dogs nor their shadows.
I thought this is some sort of illustration on Alice in Wonderland, that time she got teeny-tiny – and maybe saw still tinier dogs, so small they imperceptible to our eyes? Anyway, I guess this picture now could be sent to a contempo-art gallery, as it seems to be provided with numerous and unconnected captions.
January 23rd, 2008 at 9:04 am
I don’t get it.
January 23rd, 2008 at 9:14 pm
I don’t get it, either.
Is that urine stains caused by a pack of small dogs? But then why the High-Velocity label?
Or is it a grease spot caused by a group of small dogs that died when they fell from a height?
Please explain. It’s driving me mad with worry over the dogs!
James
January 23rd, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Just look at the picture. The dogs are there.
January 23rd, 2008 at 9:45 pm
The woman is looking at one of them.
January 24th, 2008 at 9:04 am
I would guess that the two pairs of parallel streaks (one tanish, one dark-brownish) that the women appear to be looking at, are the dogs – moving so very fast that they appear as as a blurr.
In two places, so they are moving very fast.
January 24th, 2008 at 9:19 am
Yes. I thought it would be obvious, but apparently it’s only clear to me.
Those dogs were like subatomic particles.
January 24th, 2008 at 11:25 am
I still don’t see anything. Now, I am getting older, but I do have a 19in. 1280×1024 Samsung monitor. Maybe if you put up a higher definition jpg. Even the enlarged version is only 85 KB. Or maybe its just all the years that Rummel and I have spent in Central Ohio.
January 24th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
It might be your monitor but I think it’s probably the way you are looking. It would have been clearer without the wet areas on the patio. Look closely and you will see the dogs and their shadows.
January 24th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
I too can’t see no dogs nor their shadows.
I thought this is some sort of illustration on Alice in Wonderland, that time she got teeny-tiny – and maybe saw still tinier dogs, so small they imperceptible to our eyes? Anyway, I guess this picture now could be sent to a contempo-art gallery, as it seems to be provided with numerous and unconnected captions.
January 24th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Now that I know what to look for they’re visible.
But it’s hard to pick them out against all the dirt and puddles and whatnot on the floor.
January 24th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
January 24th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Oh. Those are doogs. I thought they were schmutz.
January 24th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
I thought it’s some wet tire tracks. Of two BMXes jumping. Simultaneously.