MoviePass is a service that has gained a lot of new users lately – it allows you to see unlimited movies (only one a day) each month for $9.95, which is essentially the price of a single ticket. How it works is that they give you a Mastercard that is connected to your mobile phone – when you get to the theater, you connect with them at that time and they authorize the card specifically for the amount needed to pay for the movie and then you pay and go inside. The process is set up so that theaters can’t deny MoviePass at the box office because it is basically just another Mastercard and the only way to disable it would be to disable accept MasterCard, which is impractical or likely impossible for a host of reasons. The movie theaters receive the full price of the ticket through MoviePass, even if it is more than the $9.95 subscription fee (movies can cost almost $20 in Manhattan, for instance). In the short term, this is a “boon” for movie theaters because Wall Street investors are subsidizing their full price tickets.
Here is a NYT article on the growth of MoviePass. Per the article, they are adding 1 million subscribers a month. The ostensible play (what they say) is that they plan to “break even” on the cost of the service (if you see roughly one movie / month) but then they will make their money on using data from customers in an aggregated fashion to sell to the movie studios for marketing and targeting. They believe that this data and targeting consumers can add 5-7% to the box office gross. Note that the guy who helped found MoviePass was an executive at Netflix and RedBox named Mitch Lowe and he is very sophisticated financially and connected so he is a serious rival to the movie industry in general.
In today’s economy, companies like MoviePass are (apparently) able to raise funding for business models like this that run accounting losses and burn cash now, under the promise that they are going to make money later. For years Facebook ran cash and operating losses and now is one of the most profitable companies in the world (and they haven’t even monetized key parts like Messenger yet). Uber today still burns prodigious amounts of cash but has obviously captured critical mass in terms of usage and position in the marketplace (likely just needs to change the model to become profitable).
What is the real play for MoviePass? In the short term theaters will receive a burst of revenue (and concessions) from full ticket priced payments basically subsidized by the capital markets through MoviePass. Regardless of what MoviePass “says” about using this data for marketing, the true existential risk(s) that theaters see is that:
1. Theaters offer an “undifferentiated service”. While a ratty old theater can drive folks away, most modern theaters allow you to select your own seat, have a nice comfy chair, and have upgraded concessions. That is the “price of entry” nowadays
2. Theaters don’t control content. Other than the occasional art theater, theaters just show movies from the major studios and are a pass through of whatever content they deliver
3. Theaters have a problem with capacity optimization. Theaters are mostly empty during the day and leave seats available at night, and since customers don’t have a relationship with the theater (because they are undifferentiated), the chains don’t connect enough to do real-time pricing or other tactics to “fix” this and even out their business
4. Theaters face a challenge in that the “home experience” is rapidly approaching the quality of going to the theater, and in some cases may be better (you don’t have to watch commercials at home, for instance)
5. Theaters rely heavily on concessions to survive, which isn’t a problem per se but it drives strange behavior from both customers (you can’t bring in your own food) and the theater (weird pricing where you can’t really buy a small they drive you to a giant tub of popcorn)
6. It is a big ask for younger people to turn off their phone for 2 hours. Maybe in the future theaters will just give up and expect people to be on their mobile devices, I don’t know. Or if you have a tool like MoviePass where you aren’t as connected to the particular cost (because you pay by subscription) the fact that you can just “walk out” and it costs you nothing might make millenials more inclined to go
In summary, theaters are in a weak position like all undifferentiated retail. They have high fixed costs and no direct relationship with their customers that is substantial. If a company like MoviePass can galvanize the theater’s customers and work with the customers directly, theater owners rightly fear that MoviePass in turn could demand huge discounts for their customer base, and in turn extract the value out of the business and the theater chains would be left with the capacity and operating costs and not the key customer relationships which drive revenues.
If this occurred, it would probably lead to a rationalization of the movie industry in a variety of ways. The chains would need to live on a very small margin which would shake out the business and reduce capacity. In turn, a company like MoviePass could aggregate demand and offer differentiated pricing to encourage customers to attend during off times, or just shut down the offtimes which could allow the theater to reduce staff accordingly. They could also offer advanced technology to make purchases of concessions to be seamless and pre-ordered and even tailored to the impending customers.
This is all speculation. Maybe MoviePass just runs out of cash or investors balk. But the movie theater chains are in a difficult position with high fixed costs and little control of their movies and an indifferent relationship with their customers. MoviePass won’t be the last attacker in this space, just like how Napster may have died but ultimately they provided the impetus to change the music industry forever.
Cross posted at LITGM
6 thoughts on “Disruption – MoviePass”
I see mention of this at a theater we occasionally go to but at one or less movie per month, I’m not interested.,
You might be seeing ads for the theater’s own club card (like AMC). The theaters have tried to make their customers ‘stickier’ by offering their own affiliate cards that offer discounts. Or it could have been MoviePass but I think the theaters in general don’t like MoviePass so I’d be surprised if they let them advertise in or on their premises. But I am only speculating every theater is different and I don’t even go to the movies that often myself.
Gotta think the play for MoviePass is to get acquired by Netflix, and fold in-theater purchases to your home account. Then Netflix will know about all you watch at home plus at the theaters. Maybe even start to get some of their productions into theaters more as well.
I hate going to the movie theater. I’ve got a 5 year old 1080p projector, 120″ screen and four Ekornes chairs. That’s all the home theater I need. Better experience, less hassel, watch on my schedule. With ticket prices what they are today, I probably paid it off two years ago. And I get to watch classics on the big screen. The only drawback is no matinees.
This is a product directed at my children. For now. They love going to the movies for all the reasons people did in the ’50’s. In a few years, they’ll have kids in a house in the suburbs and they’ll be telling me I need a 4K projector so they can take my 1080p.
@mrs davis – probably a result of my frequenting seraphic secret, a blog run by a conservative Hollywood screenwriter, i have gotten an appreciation for both the big screen and classic Hollywood.
we have a local theater who, though fathomevents.com and tcm, runs some classic movies once/twice a month, on sundays and wesnesdays,
and when it comes to home theaters, i’ll put up hitchcock’s north by northwest, when grant’s character is standing alone in a ‘iowa’ (really Bakersfield CA) cornfield on the big screen vs your home theater.
You really see the immensity and lonesomeness Hitch intended on the …..big screen.
I too suspect that Movie Pass is acquisition bait. I don’t see the value of the increment of information they provide supporting a stand-alone business.
Uber is toast. They haven’t been able to reconcile what drivers are willing to drive for with what users are willing to pay. The question is: will anyone? I can’t believe that their investors will keep pouring money in until self driving cars save them. They are, to a first approximation, nothing more than a good idea. Mark Twain quoted them at a dime a dozen in car load lots. Strangely, this is something that inflation doesn’t seem to have changed. They have no plant, no relationship with their drivers, which they deny are employees and their customers are a download away from taking their business elsewhere, as are their drivers. Their only asset is the massive stupidity of the taxi industry which is also available to anyone else that cares to take up a share and probably depreciating rapidly.
Recent IPO’s have had terms so one sided that they amounted to a request for investment while explicitly disallowing any say from the shareholders in governance or guaranty of revenue from eventual profits, if any. P. T. Barnum had something to say about this as well.
Comments are closed.