Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Extremely Cool, but…

    Posted by David Foster on June 25th, 2018 (All posts by )

    A Gloster Meteor in flyable condition–the Meteor being Britain’s first operational jet fighter–has come to the US on a permanent basis.  The jet has been purchased by the World Heritage Air Museum, which is located near Detroit.  It will be at the EAA Oshkosh show this July, along with two other early British jets.

    The prototype Meteor first flew on March 5, 1943, and the type’s first use was against the V-1 cruise missiles that plagued London.  Meteors were sent to the Continent in early 1945, they were restricted in their operating area for fear of having downed aircraft captured by the Germans or the Soviets and were used for airfield defense and ground-attack missions.

    I believe this was the only flyable Meteor in the UK except for two owned by the Martin-Baker company and used to test ejection seats…as working aircraft these planes probably aren’t available for public display very often, if at all.  It’s great to have a Meteor in the US, but I would have thought that given this airplane’s historical significance, someone in the UK would have raised the money to keep it flying there.


    5 Responses to “Extremely Cool, but…”

    1. Jonathan Says:

      Very cool.

    2. Bill Brandt Says:

      That is interesting – about their fear of the Soviet Union at that time. Maybe I am wrong but I remember from somewhere that the Soviets got hold of a Rolls Royce Jet engine that though reverse engineering became the powerplant of the MiG 15.

    3. David Foster Says:

      Bill…indeed, not only did the Soviets get hold of a Rolls-Royce jet engine, but it was *given and licensed* to them by the British government.

      Mikoyan (the Mi in ‘Mig’) had suggested to Stalin the they obtain an engine from Britain, to which Stalin replied, “What fool will sell us his secrets?” However, he agreed to let Mikoyan try.

      The fool turned out to be Sir Stafford Cripps, the Labour Minister of Trade.

    4. David Foster Says:

      Sergei Khrushchev, the Premier’s son, tells an interestingly different version of how the Mig-15 got its engine, which his says was told to him by Mikoyan himself. According to Mikoyan, agreement in principle had been reached to obtain the engine from the British and he traveled to the Rolls-Royce plant to finish up the details. The British kept stalling, and Mikoyan was getting irritated. He started needling the Rolls-Royce executives along the lines of, “you only say you’re in charge of the company, but actually you’re just like us—you can’t take a step without the ministry.”

      Finally, a RR executive proposed a wager–a game of billiards. If Mikoyan won, the Soviets would get the engine. If the RR exec won, the deal was off. Mikoyan hadn’t played the game for a long time, but saw no choice but to agree. They played, and Mikoyan won.

      It seems that somebody must have been pulling somebody’s leg: Either Mikoyan was pulling Sergei’s leg (and I have no idea whether Mikoyan had a reputation as a practical joker), or the RR exec knew that the deal had already been approved and was just having a little fun with the Russians…or Sergei made the whole thing up, which seems unlikely.

    5. Adam Maas Says:

      There’s also an NF11 flying in the UK, owned by the same group that owns the T7.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.