Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
    Loading
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Violence

    Posted by Assistant Village Idiot on July 23rd, 2018 (All posts by )

    The Babylon Bee has nice parody of the change of meaning of the word “violence.” They are more accurate than they know. Dictionaries are primarily descriptive rather than prescriptive in the last sixty years*.  They no longer tell you what the best people think a word means or should mean, as many of us were used to in grammar school many years ago.** Words change in meaning, especially in the directions of heightening or diminishing of effect, or generalisation versus specification.  The word molest meant only to bother or annoy, or perhaps interfere with a person, until quite recently.  The first reference using it in a sexual way was 1950. Awful and terrible have changed. For a very great change, you can follow the word silly over a thousand years. (Good music at the link.)


    There are also longstanding examples of milder uses of violence, of doing violence to an idea, or a violent storm.
    The World Health Organization’s definition, though it starts with the conventional idea of physical force or injury, is already moving in the direction the Babylon Bee parodies:

    “the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation,” (although the group acknowledges that the inclusion of “the use of power” in its definition expands on the conventional understanding of the word.) Wikipedia.

    Whenever important words change they cause disruption, as people are no longer talking about quite the same thing.  Cults redefine words so that they can claim to be following traditional (or biblical) values while introducing new ideas. 
    It is fine to stick to the usual definitions of a word in one’s own use.  I encourage it, because it aids in understanding what other ages what other ages meant, rather than being a prisoner of last Tuesday’s culture.  But the language will change whether we will or know, and sometimes it helps to understand that other people are using a different meaning.  They themselves may not be the instigators. Young people are quick to pick up how a word is used in their current context and adapt.  They use racist, or violence, in they way they are taught in some of their classes and by the more excitable of their friends. Even those who basically hold to the stricter ideas of those terms that I would use are likely to have at least slightly expanded meanings of the term, by my lights. It may be better to ask “what do you mean when you say “violence?” than to simply declare it wrong. (Even though it is wrong, dammit.)

    *The Story of Ain’t by David Skinner is a solid and entertaining look at the change in dictionaries.

    **Note also the word “grammar” school, grades 1-8, where we would say elementary and middle, or elementary and junior high these days. One of the primary aims was that children would learn to write and say things correctly. We say “of course,” but they did not care so much about science or more than basic geography and history a hundred years ago.  Lots of penmanship, lots of multiplication tables.

    Cross-posted at Assistant Village Idiot

     

    6 Responses to “Violence”

    1. David Foster Says:

      I have seen the phrase “the weaponization of free speech” used by Progs on several occasions lately. For example, “right-wing” speakers on university campuses represent the WOFS, and the Russians are weaponizing (American) free speech.

      It seems pretty clear that this phraseology is a precursor to the ramping up of *assaults* on free speech.

      Battlefield preparation, to stay with the weaponization theme.

    2. Mike K Says:

      I would say that “grammar schools” were also quite determined to teach children math, in the form of arithmetic and simple computation. The graduates of such schools were able to make change on purchases, for example.

      Have you watched teenagers trying to make change, lately ?

    3. Grurray Says:

      The latest political cult to redefine reality is MoveOn with their campaign that low wages are violence. “Rights” is another word that means something entirely different to the Left. Although with a $15 minimum wage he would quickly discover his right to search for a new job after the donut shop lays him off.

    4. Anonymous Says:

      Violence has violate in its root. I think that’s the heart of what the word means.

      To violate a person’s person, thoughts or tribe, is what violence means. Now one could argue about thoughts, but they are the cause of the rest.

    5. Anonymous Says:

      Yes, there was a time when one had to commit a physical act in order to violate someone. Apparently we were tougher then and words caused no violation of person, family, or group. I prefer that understanding to violated feelings.

      Go to your safe place.

      Death6

    6. Assistant Village Idiot Says:

      @ Mike K – I would say that teenagers have never been much good at it. The samples we remember were not likely representative.