Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Anecdotes: The Mango Lady

    Posted by Jonathan on February 27th, 2019 (All posts by )

    The Mango Lady is a peddler who does business under the elevated train tracks at a major intersection. I have seen her many times but never bought anything from her. However, I know someone who knows people who say that they have.

    The story is, if you ask the Mango Lady her price she will reply that mangoes are $1 each or $3 for two. Yes. My friend’s friends wanted to buy several mangoes but made clear that they would pay no more than $1 each. They weren’t about to get taken by the 2-for-$3 gimmick. The Mango Lady laughed and said: You wouldn’t believe how many people fall for that.


    14 Responses to “Anecdotes: The Mango Lady”

    1. Bill Brandt Says:

      Last Sunday I got some popcorn at the theater. It was $6.14. I gave the attendant $10.25 and it completely flummoxed him. Equally amazing I go to this discount wine and booze store – they have a 750 ML bottle of scotch for $20 and a 1.5 ml for $23. I guess there are plenty of people buying the smaller one.

      So I believe the mango lady.

    2. Mike K Says:

      Bill, I hope that was a 1.5 liter bottle. I’m not sure you can find a 1.5 ml bottle.

    3. Mrs. Davis Says:

      Almost half the country is democrat.

    4. Bill Brandt Says:


      Of course you are correct. Amazing to me that twice the size for three or four dollars more and they still stocked the smaller one. I guess you could call that a tax on stupidity?

    5. Russtovich Says:

      For what it’s worth my brother and I met in New York with our spouses a few years ago (2011 I think). We all went to Central Park one morning and stopped at one of the watery bits with a small food/drink stall nearby. The vendor had small and large cans of Heineken. My brother and I asked the price.

      “$3” was the reply.

      “For small or large?” we asked.

      “Either” was the reply.

      Needless to say we each had a large. :)

    6. Bill Brandt Says:

      @Russtovich McDonalds does that with their drinks. Small, Medium or large – same price – $1. Makes no sense to me. But apparently it makes sense for others.

    7. Brian Says:

      “they have a 750 ML bottle of scotch for $20 and a 1.5 ml for $23”
      Good grief, 1.5L of “scotch” for $23, it must taste like turpentine. If all you’re looking to do is get drunk, you should just buy super discount vodka and mix it with something that you like.

      “Small, Medium or large – same price – $1. Makes no sense to me.”
      They’re just selling access to the soda machine (which is pure profit for them, since the soda costs essentially nothing, is my understanding), and you can pick your cup. But I’m sure they’ve found that just saying something like that confuses people, so they have to let them pick a size.

      There are times when I don’t take advantage of BOGO deals, because I want one package of english muffins, not another one to either shove in the freezer or stick on a shelf. “Free” isn’t everything.

    8. James the lesser Says:

      Gallon jugs of milk are loss leaders at the local supermarkets, so half gallons and gallons are about the same price. We still use up milk fast enough that nothing goes sour, but I know some folks for whom a gallon would last well over a week–except that it wouldn’t and they’d have to throw out the spoiled excess.

    9. Mike K Says:

      We do not buy gallon jugs of milk as my wife cannot pick them up. She has arthritis but my sister, who is four years older than she, tore her rotator cuff picking up a gallon of milk. I drink a lot of milk so nothing spoils.

    10. Mike Cunningham Says:

      While back, I was shopping in my local supermarket in Durham City, UK, and spotted a sales sign for washing bleach powder.

      It read, and I swear that this is true, ” One for £7.00. Two for £14.00 (Sterling)”

    11. John Says:

      OK, Bill Brandt, I’ll bite… you’ve flummoxed me too. Why did you give him the extra quarter?

      “It was $6.14. I gave the attendant $10.25 and it completely flummoxed him. ”

      Is it just that you’d rather not have the quarters? Who cares? I could see it with, say $5.25, give him $10.25, get a 5 back, no change, no arithmetic…

    12. M Garbowski Says:


      Bill may answer for himself, but I used to do stuff like that all the time before switching to mostly cashless transactions. The simple purpose is to avoid getting back $0.86 in change. Ideally, one would give $10.14, but often one does not have 4 pennies on hand, so you give $10.25 and get back $6.09 instead of $5.86. I’m not surprised cashiers and attendants today would be confused by this given the number of cashless transactions. I used to carefully keep a varied assortment of change in my pockets to facilitate cash transactions and any decent cashier would know how to handle such exchanges. These days I usually leave the house with no coins at all.

    13. MCS Says:

      I’ve seen the same arithmetic on Amazon from time to time. One of something costs X or a two pack for 4X. It makes me suspicious enough to go elsewhere. As well as wonder who falls for it.

    14. Tom G Says:

      Didn’t you see the recent Bernie Ad?

      Buy 1 beer, for the price of two.


      Get a 2nd beer — absolutely free!

      There are lots of cases where the bigger size is about twice as expensive, but only ~50% bigger.
      I get the smaller sizes, then. Or two.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.