Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Tearing off the Fig Leaf

    Posted by TM Lutas on August 27th, 2019 (All posts by )

    In 2019, New York finally did it. They gave up pretending that they can ever run the state under the state constitution and the normal rules of American governance. After pretending since WW II that the state’s housing situation was in a temporary state of emergency started by that war and periodically renewing the state of emergency this year, the rent control and stabilization kept the emergency but got rid of the time limit. The state of emergency is now permanent.

    On pages three and four of the bill, six separate edits make it clear that New York has adopted a permanent state of emergency. There’s no more renewals, no more expirations, no more re-examination, no return to normalcy.

    Most importantly, there is no state Constitutional amendment. The guarantee for just compensation for a taking of property remains. The prohibition of using the government to provide private benefit remains. In a time-limited emergency, such guarantees can be temporarily suspended, but not permanently. The state of New York has been claiming Hitler as their justification for suspending the New York Constitution for decades. No longer.

    Now New York claims the right to suspend their Constitution permanently and to widen the suspension from a few limited districts to the entire state. This is a horrifically bad idea. It’s also probably unconstitutional. But will anyone notice?


    5 Responses to “Tearing off the Fig Leaf”

    1. Brian Says:

      The noxiously named SAFE Act was jammed through under “emergency” rules to prevent a few upstate Dems from chickening out if the public was given a chance to know what was going on and start lobbying them.

      The GOP in NY has been shockingly long-lived for a large blue state, but they were completely obliterated last year. Already most of upstate has been seriously hollowed out, but it’s going to be a real steep, real fast crash from here on out.

      I really hate the way that people say things like “Well, they voted for the Democrats, so they are just getting what they deserve”, when the fact is that “one person one vote” was a despicable act of judicial usurpation. The NY state constitution was always explicit about NYC not being able to have a majority of the state senate, but that was thrown in the garbage by the Supreme Court, and the downfall of the state, like all similar states dominated by a large metropolis, began shortly thereafter.

    2. Mike K Says:

      With Chicago, downstate Illinois might have a chance for a divorce when the state goes bankrupt.

      I know there is an active movement to create a new state outside Cook County but I know no details.

      Too bad NYC did not secede as it threatened to do during the Civil War.

    3. Jay Guevara Says:

      Don’t be so negative: this time rent control, like socialism, will work, because they’ll have the right people in charge.

      In unrelated news, pending legislation will repeal the law of gravity and make pi equal to 3.0 exactly.

    4. MCS Says:

      I’m with Jay, this is Federalism in action. I’ll go one better, If the minimum wage needs to be $15 an hour, rents should be capped at $0.30/SF as well. How better to solve the homeless crisis.

    5. Mary Wilbur Says:

      I didn’t know there was a movement in Illinois to divorce Cook County. Thanks for letting me know. I live in Kane County, a Chicago exurb. I would be happy to join this movement. Actually, it would help if Mike Madigan, Dem Speaker of the Illinois House for the last 40 years, disappeared. A lot of Republicans in this state are also part of the problem.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.