The Spring of Smears – Unfortunately, Part 1

At Instapundit,  Althouse quotes Hoyt, the NY Times “public editor,” on the now infamous (but at least usefully fund-raising) investigation of McCain .   Keller defends the story “about a man nearly felled by scandal who rebuilt himself as a fighter against corruption but is still ‘careless about appearances, careless about his reputation, and that’s a pretty important thing to know about somebody who wants to be president of the United States.'”

Of course, we might question the paper’s carelessness about “appearances” and, indeed,  its “reputation.”   The defense seems to be that the nonexistent “sex” scandal was not important; the role of lobbyists and the earlier scandal were.  Such innocence on the part of the paper, such dirty mindedness on the part of its readers!  Ah, if we were only as serious as they.

Read more

Wisconsin Primary Analysis

I am a very simple guy, and I ask simple questions. This political season I am asking a question to myself over and over and over – just how many conservative/libertarian folks such as myself have been crossing over and voting for Obama in open primaries? My initial guess was a bunch, and it looks as though I may have been correct.

Read more

More on Communications Intercepts

On Friday, Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell and Attorney General Michael Mukasey sent a letter to House Intelligence Committee chairman Silvestre Reyes. Note this sentence:

We have lost intelligence information this past week as a direct result of the uncertainty created by Congress’ failure to act.

My previous post on this subject is here.