Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • The Laffer Curve, as Explained in 1377

    Posted by David Foster on May 22nd, 2010 (All posts by )

    Ibn Khaldun:

    It should be known that at the beginning of the dynasty, taxation yields a large revenue from small assessments. At the end of the dynasty, taxation yields a small revenue from large assessments.

    The reason for this is that when the dynasty follows the ways (sunan) of the religion, it imposes only such taxes as are stipulated by the religious law, such as charity taxes, the land tax, and the poll tax. They mean small assessments, because, as everyone knows, the charity tax on property is low. The same applies to the charity tax on grain and cattle, and also to the poll tax, the land tax, and all other taxes required by the religious law. They have fixed limits that cannot be overstepped.

    When the dynasty follows the ways of group feeling and (political) superiority, it necessarily has at first a desert attitude, as has been mentioned before. The desert attitude requires kindness, reverence, humility, respect for the property of other people, and disinclination to appropriate it, except in rare instances. Therefore, the individual imposts and assessments, which together constitute the tax revenue, are low. When tax assessments and imposts upon the subjects are low, the latter have the energy and desire to do things. Cultural enterprises grow and increase, because the low taxes bring satisfaction. When cultural enterprises grow, the number of individual imposts and assessments mounts. In consequence, the tax revenue, which is the sum total of (the individual assessments), increases.

    Read the whole thing.

    Via Isegoria.


    5 Responses to “The Laffer Curve, as Explained in 1377”

    1. Robert Schwartz Says:

      I misread the headline as “The Laffer Curve, as Explained in 1337“.

      I need to spend less time at my computer.

    2. david foster Says:

      Wow, that’s pretty esoteric!

    3. LibertyAtStake Says:

      I have spent a large portion of my day today filling out my “blog roll” (being relatively new to this pursuit). You are my most valued find of the day.
      [For a light hearted take on our present peril]

    4. Paul Milenkovic Says:

      When you think of it, the United States of America represents the ultimate “blowback” against Islamic statecraft.

      How, you may ask?

      There was a brief period of time when the Mongols ruled much of Asia and parts of Africa and Europe. Militarily, they were unstoppable. There may have been a number of factors, cultural and technological, but my understanding is that they were superb horsemen, and they had the recurve bow, and they were able to shoot in motion.

      Now contact with the Mongols was an ugly thing as they used their military prowess to frightening effect. But once you were conquered by the Mongols (you will be assimilated, resistance is futile — could you surrender to those folks or did they have to kill a bunch of your people first, because they were Mongols?) — being ruled by the Mongols apparently wasn’t such a bad thing.

      You see, the Mongols in peace time were thoroughly Libertarian. Low taxes and low tariff barriers, free passage within their territories, complete ambivalence to whatever religious beliefs or practices you held.

      What happened next is that Mongol rule collapsed, perhaps because of a combination of “overstretch” and not having worked out rules of dynastic succession very well.

      What happened in the mean time is that Europeans got used to the world’s first era of globalization and free trade, in terms of spices and other goods from the Far East. What happened after that is the the Arab-Muslim Middle East got back on its feet as it were and reverted to the traditional ways of high taxes on the trade caravans.

      And what happened after that is that the folks in Portugal developed the sea route East around Africa, and the envious Spanish developed the sea route West to what proved to be a whole ‘nother continent, and English Hank was paired up with Spanish Cathy so that the emerging nation in England could benefit from relations with the Spanish Superpower, and now you know the Rest . . . of . . . the . . . Story.

    5. Contemplationist Says:

      That right-wing extremist Ibn Khaldun!


    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.