Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Not a Joke

    Posted by David Foster on July 12th, 2010 (All posts by )

    You may remember that back in April, the United Nations elected Iran to its Commission on the Status of Women. No, this was not an April Fool joke, not an article in the Onion, not a blog post from Iowahawk, but real news in the real world.

    PowerLine was reminded of this story by today’s headline: Iran human rights chief defends stoning sentence.

    In other U.N. related news, the Security Council on Friday denounced the sinking of a South Korean ship–but managed to do this without denouncing anyone in particular for having sunk it.

    Why do “progressives,” and even many old-line liberals, continue to have such a worshipful attitude toward the U.N.? If you corner one of the latter and press him on this point, he will probably say something along the lines of, “It would be so wonderful if it worked, and people could just talk their problems out instead of fighting.”

    This attitude reminds me of the story of the engineer and the mathematician who were trapped at the bottom of a deep, dark well, with absolutely vertical and slippery sides. The engineer was in despair, but the mathematician was cheerful and optimistic.

    “How on earth do you think we’re ever going to get out of here?” asked the engineer.

    “It’s easy,” responded the mathematician. “Assume a ladder.”

    Today’s continuing U.N.-worship seems to me to contain a large element of ladder-assuming.

    The WSJ article on the Korean resolution also notes that “More amazing still, the resolution that didn’t bark is being hailed as a deft way to lure North Korea back to the six party talks over its nuclear program. Follow the logic: Since the North wasn’t condemned for doing what everyone knows it did, the North’s leaders might now be appeased enough to return to the nuclear talks they walked out of last year. Sink a ship, and gain new diplomatic respect.”


    5 Responses to “Not a Joke”

    1. veryretired Says:

      All that matters to the progressive/tranzi mind are intentions. Peace is good, dialogue is good, negotiation is good, and so on.

      If those good things are your intention, then the policy to achieve them becomes the achievement.

      What actually happens down here on planet Earth doesn’t really matter. If things don’t go according to the intention, then the evil opposition is to blame for sabotaging the effort.

      When you live in cloud cuckoo land, wishes are reality.

    2. david foster Says:

      An Iranian woman was recently raped and murdered by Basij forces, for the crime of violating the dress code.

    3. Jonathan Says:

      For many people hope counts more than reality.

    4. Michael Kennedy Says:

      The poor Shah. Dumped by Jimmy Carter for the “saint” Khomeini. He tried to bring his people into the 20th century and this is what they are left with. The Iranians are too worldly and knowledgeable to be enslaved for long by this cult of ignorant thugs. It required a vicious war for the Arabs to conquer Persia and convert them to Islam. When they throw off this tyranny, I predict that Islam will also be renounced.

      My fear is that they will all be destroyed in a nuclear exchange with Israel. Tony Cordesman’s study of such a war concluded that 28 million Persians would die compared to 600,000 Israelis and that Israel, though terribly wounded, would survive but Persia would not.

    5. shannon Love Says:

      Jospeh Stalin was one of the key founders of the United Nations. He allowed nothing in its structure that would threaten him at all. Western leaders, naive and hopeful let him get away with it. Mao sat on the security council for nearly 30 years. Would we accept an organization in which Hitler had played the role of Stalin and Mao? Why should we tolerate one so contaminated?

      Stalin saw the UN as a weapon against the free world. The first and last time when the UN lived up to its original mandate was when Stalin boycotted it. Thereafter, he and successors were careful to control it. The UN is institutional hostile to democracy, free speech and voluntary economics.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.