Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Soon soon coming of the Mahdi?

    Posted by Charles Cameron on March 28th, 2011 (All posts by )

    [ cross-posted from Zenpundit ]

    *

    Okay, I’d say things are heating up. Here’s a screen grab from what we are led to believe is a recent video from Iran, made with government backing as described below the fold.

    death-of-abdullah-sign-of-mahdi.jpg

    This does not bode well…

    *

    The Christian thriller novelist Joel Rosenberg (author of The Twelfth Imam) has a new blog post up, in which he cites a Christian Broadcasting Network story — which in turn refers to a video posted with some introductory materials on his blog by Reza Kahlili (author of A Time to Betray: The Astonishing Double Life of a CIA Agent Inside the Revolutionary Guards of Iran).

    According to Kahlili, who has also posted the full video to YouTube, it is a half-hour long program sponsored by the Basij militia and the Office of the President of Iran, affirming the soon-return of the Mahdi.

    And containing “inflammatory language” about King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (see subtitle above)? Can I say that?

    For what it’s worth, the supposed “hadith” about the death of King Abdullah is discussed in some detail at The Wake-Up Project, so it’s definitely “in the air” — but I don’t recall seeing any references to it in Abbas Amanat, Abdulazziz Sachedina, or any of the lists of Signs of the Coming I’ve read, so my suspicion is that this is an opportunistic addition to the corpus rather than a reliable hadith.

    Which brings me to my last point:

    I am not posting these materials to encourage panic — that’s what terrorism strives for, and it is the very opposite of what I would wish to see. If anything, these stirrings of Mahdist sentiment should make us more careful and attentive to the serious scholarly work that has been done in this area. Jean-Pierre Filiu‘s book Apocalypse in Islam, which I reviewed for Jihadology, would be an excellent place to start.

    *

    There are plenty of other things going on that I would love to track, blog about or comment on these days, but for the next while I shall try to restrain myself and focus in on this particular issue and its ramifications:

    • Contemporary Shi’ite Mahdist expectation
    • The Iranian nuclear program in the light of Mahdist expectation
    • Iranian attempts to use Mahdism to unite Sunni and Shi’a
    • Mahdism and jihad
    • The role of Khorasan in Mahdist rhetoric
    • Christian apocalyptic responses to Mahdist stirrings
    • Joel Rosenberg‘s book, The Twelfth Imam
    • Joel Richardson‘s book, The Islamic Antichrist
    • Glenn Beck‘s increasing focus on Iranian Mahdism
    • The increasing influence of Islamic and Christian apocalyptic on geopolitics

    This is a pretty complex and potent mix of topics, and while I’ll post some individual pieces of the puzzle as I see it, I shall also try to put together a “bigger picture” piece with the whole mosaic laid out.

    *

    Apart from that, I remain deeply committed to questions of chivalry and peace-making, and will continue to monitor developments and write what I can on those topics as time allows…

     

    5 Responses to “Soon soon coming of the Mahdi?”

    1. Paul Milenkovic Says:

      I response to a book drive, I sent a copy of the political biography “Mayor” by Ed Koch along with Frank Herbert’s science fiction fantasy novel “Dune” to the US soldiers in Iraq.

      Maybe that wasn’t the right thing to do. I have the uneasy feeling that these two versions of leadership (the one-time Mayor of New York City along with the fictional heir to the Atriedes family) will be melded so that when the Mahdi emerges from the deep desert, he will be this blue-eyed bald-headed guy with a Brooklyn accent who will greet his massed followers with the incantation “How’m-eyedoin?”

    2. Michael Kennedy Says:

      I fear that we are going to see an Iranian attack on Israel in the next couple of years. Everything Obama is doing would tend to encourage them. The Mahdi fixation of Ahmadinejad and some imams suggests that rational thought, which we could rely on with the USSR, is not a strong factor. I would remind everyone of Tony Cordesman’s paper a few years ago.

      http://csis.org/publication/iran-israel-and-nuclear-war

      The short version is that Israel would survive although badly damaged. Iran would not survive as a nation state. The “Petroleum Age” would be over, at least in so far as the middle east is concerned.

    3. Charles Cameron Says:

      Paul:

      My head hurts.

      Michael:

      Thank you for the pointer to the Cordesman paper — there’s another war game scenario discussed at this site that might be of interest.

      FWIW, Timothy Furnish, author of Holiest Wars: Islamic Mahdis, their Jihads and Osama bin Laden and one of our few scholars actively following Mahdism at his MahdiWatch blog, visited Tehran for one of the Mahdist conferences a couple of years back, and doesn’t believe Ahmadinejad would use nuclear weapons because they’d make such an unholy mess for the Mahdi to clean up.

      J-P Filiu, author of Apocalypse in Islam on the other hand, didn’t seem to be quite so sure… But that’s an area I hope to explore in some detail shortly — not that I’ll be able to give a definitive answer, but I’d hope to be able to lay out some of the considerations in a bit more detail…

    4. A Conservative Teacher Says:

      As I understand it, the Mahdi will fight to rid the world of wrongdoing, injustice and tyranny… that’s gotta be bad news for Iran and Syria and the Taliban, right?

    5. LFMayor Says:

      I’m reading this as “in the near future there will be more dead muslims”, possibly by a huge red on red action. I’m striving to find a negative angle, as war and conflict between Israel and the West are inevitable with these populations anyway. Bully! Might as well get it over with, all the sooner all the better.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.