Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Well, Why Not?

    Posted by David Foster on December 30th, 2011 (All posts by )

    Admit Britain to NAFTA?

    The acronym even still works…”NA” could stand for “North Atlantic” as well as “North American.”

    via Neptunus Lex


    3 Responses to “Well, Why Not?”

    1. Jonathan Says:

      Why not.

    2. JoseAngel Says:

      A great article.

      Does anyone here still remember about the Lisbon Strategy? That was supposed to transform Europe into the largest economic and most advanced technological society of the world by 2010? That´s the kind of grandiose project mentality that brought the ruin of many empires. I suspect that in the end most of the enormous pool of funds allocated for this patronizing goal wound up in failed real estate projects, hotels, residential complexes, shopping centers and millions of Europeans on living on welfare and refusing to work so as not to lose Brussels’s holy assistance. Instead of developing universities, factories and investigation centers, as was the original European vision of the project.

      I think the differences between Britain and her continental partners are historical and irreversible, Britain´s liberal heritage has given the world rich and thriving societies like Canada, United States, Australia and New Zealand and shown the way to prosperity to many other nations that now follow those recipes for economic growth and stability. Can anyone say the same about the France´s economic and government model or Germany´s? I don´t think so, yet they want to impose their particular vision to the rest of Europe.

      I definitely think Britain belongs with Canada and the US by nature of economics, language, institutions, culture and philosophical views of the world they want to live in.

      Happy New Year

    3. lukas Says:

      Because over 60% of the UK’s International Trade is with EU countries?

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.