Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Interesting Data

    Posted by David Foster on January 25th, 2012 (All posts by )

    A Flesch-Kinkaid analysis of State of the Union addresses says that Obama’s speech last night was at a grade level of 8.4. By comparison, JFK’s inaugural was at a level of 12.0, Richard Nixon was 11.5, George H W Bush was 8.6, and George W Bush was 10.4.


    11 Responses to “Interesting Data”

    1. James Bennett Says:

      How about running a Voight-Kampff test to determine whether he’s a replicant?

    2. tyouth Says:

      This guy was a constitutional lawyer at the U of C? I still believe that you have to be half a moron or half crazy to be a collectivist.

    3. Jonathan Says:

      I still believe that you have to be half a moron or half crazy to be a collectivist.

      Which half do you think we are dealing with here?

    4. Robert Schwartz Says:

      I assume that his speech writers worked very hard to dumb the speech down to the middle school level. They are not going to fool anyone with half a brain at this point, so they have to go after the votes of complete morons.

    5. Carl Ortona Says:

      Actually, the comments at the site (A Flesch-Kinkaid analysis of State of the Union addresses)
      raise some interesting questions … not so much regarding the content of the speech (ugghh) but the measure of what passes for ‘edumacated speechifying’ (sorry for that simpsons reference)… liked the reference to Grant’s crisp prose especially (at the site’s comment section)… a good link

    6. David Foster Says:

      Robert Avrech has some thoughts inspired by Obama’s SOTU speech.

    7. tyouth Says:

      Jon, I think it’s half crazy since, in his formative years, he was indoctrinated by leftists and found succor from them in his professional life. He probably knows better now (surely he’s not ignorant of what ways of living have brought what success we have as a society up to this point in time) but he’s found success in the Alinsky-JesseJacksonism way of operating and won’t change although he should feel a lot of remorse about now and henceforth if I’m right.

    8. Vader Says:

      Robert Schwarz is right. Politically, it makes a lot of sense to keep the speech at an eighth-grade level.

      Now, if you can combine eighth-grade diction and grammar with first-rate ideas, you’ve got political genius of Churchillian magnitude. If your eighth-grade diction and grammar reflect eighth-grade ideas, you’ve got Obama.

    9. Nicholas Says:

      I’m going to play Devil’s Advocate here (and I’m not talking about the pinball game…).

      As a professional writer, I am encouraged to write short sentences in short paragraphs. Simplifying language increases comprehension even with an intelligent and well-educated audience. I often find myself writing long sentences only to split them in the middle, to make it easier to follow.

      This is not because I assume my audience is dumb. They aren’t. It’s just that there’s no reason to make something harder to read than it needs to be (or, for that matter, longer than it needs to be).

    10. Percy Dovetonsils Says:

      +1 to Nicholas for the Simpsons reference. Obama’s speeches could only be helped by more Simpsons references. Like this one:

      Lisa: Grandpa, weren’t you suspicious about why you started getting checks in the mail for no reason?

      Grandpa: I just figured it was because the Dimmycrats were back in office…

    11. Mike Says:

      He WAS speaking to Leftists, after all. Gotta keep it simple!

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.