Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Less Than a Year

    Posted by Dan from Madison on December 18th, 2013 (All posts by )

    I saw this today:

    It is a pretty good ad. Zerocare has been a debacle, as we all expected it to be. It isn’t just a “broken website”. It is a classical 20th century big government scheme, completely unprepared and unable to deal with a 21st century economy – this is one of the main thrusts of America 3.0.

    Every Republican (and the groups cheering for them) should just shut up about pretty much everything but this one issue. Make the Democrats own it. It is theirs. It passed by a straight party vote. Make them eat it in 2014.

     

    8 Responses to “Less Than a Year”

    1. Michael Kennedy Says:

      This ad will be replicated all cover the country. I wonder how many Democrats will “retire” by fall when the employers have dropped 100 million health insurance polices? The panic will start next month when the real numbers start to trickle out.

    2. Bill Brandt Says:

      I am hoping that the House passed this debacle of a budget-compromise with that very thing in mind.

      Either that or they are really stupid.

    3. VXXC Says:

      Q: What is the main complaint about Obamacare?

      A: It doesn’t deliver.

      A host of pols are lining up to make it rain. Possbily including the ambitious Chris Christie [not likely, he’s being fatally undermined by the National organs of the Media, Moody’s and the rest as we speak]. Oh Christie may be the nominee, but he’ll never be POTUS. And it wouldn’t matter if he did.

      What will America 3.0 do for us?
      It will make it rain, won’t it?

      That’s the 21st century solution. Perhaps we need a rainmaker party.
      ===================================
      There.Is.No.Republican.Party.

      Reagan was a New Deal Democrat, he and that electorate are long gone.

      He was also freakishly sui generis, and I’m a fan.
      =======================
      Free Will: No God, King, or Election saves us.

    4. Dan from Madison Says:

      “Either that or they are really stupid.” I lean toward the latter. Sadly.

    5. VXXC Says:

      They’re not stupid.

      They are taking care of their interests, which of course lie with government.

      Stupid would be continuing to believe that a National Party of Small, limited government can exist.

      That’s rather like a sales force being told by their employer to make less sales and that revenue is best which raises the minimum money. You’re unlikely to contact Amazon today and inform them to cut back on sales of America 3.0, too much money is coming in. You are unlikely to demand more critical and negative reviews, and less revenue.

      Workers seldom demand pay cuts. People want MORE.

      Limited government is only possible by FEAR. Just as expansion of freedom in the West was the expansion of violence from the mounted knight to the archers, pikemen, musketeers, and in America the Rifleman. That is the actual march of Liberty.

      The Founders limited and divided the government from a base motive of FEAR.

      They also cleverly placed the various low characters drawn to master their fellow man against each other.

      The latter characteristic of divided and limited government is long dead, the New Deal killed democracy and the republic. And the voters LOVED IT, and LOVE FDR still. Free stuff doncha know. And 1/3 of the nation openly peddled serfdom in exchange for free [stolen] goodies willfully votes for it again and again.

      When modern American thinks of the Constitution, what does he think of?

      The Bill of Rights.

      Which are Amendments. The governing document is DEAD. Our Liberties [mostly] remain only because of FEAR.

      The putative Republicans do not FEAR ye or their voters, they FEAR those around them in DC. They FEAR the tens of millions who will not suffer one cent of cuts* not the serfs who grumble as they pay. The Tea Party being so far the grumblers party.

      Grumblers are not to be feared, they are to be chastised into silence. Which was effectively done by the various combinations of Alphabet soup, who openly act without FEAR. Why should they? The Rattlesnake at the top of this page has only his rattle, no fangs. Babies have rattles too. They also grumble. This is how ye are viewed [including by me]. Grumble away, if you become too troublesome the slightest contact with Power and you’ll be silent. They know it.

      They’re right.

      *except for cuts to veterans, who just saw their retirement cut 24%. One dollar in four. History will vindicate whether this is folly or not.

    6. VXXC Says:

      More charitably America now is suffering the terrible illness ancient to man of Predatory Government motivated by malice, spurred on by FEAR and it’s sister HATE.

      This is ancient to man, just new to America.

      Hence we seem to be slow to recognize and react to the threat.

      Remember the Rattlesnake is feared for fangs, not rattle.

    7. Jeffrey Carter (@pointsnfigures) Says:

      Ad was made by @endingspending; follow them on Twitter. Senator Mark Warner, D-VA said tonight on Fox News he’d vote for Obamacare again. He wants to fix it. It’s a bad law that should never have been passed. There is nothing to fix.

    8. Lexington Green Says:

      Repeal and replace, and fire the people who caused the disaster.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.