Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
    Loading
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Economics Nobel

    Posted by Mitch Townsend on October 11th, 2004 (All posts by )

    The University of Chicago is nearly as dominant in October as the New York Yankees, but this was not the year (Go Sox!). This year’s prize went to Finn Kydland of Norway (Carnegie Mellon University and the University of California) and Edward Prescott of the United States (Arizona State University and the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis).

    Their breakthrough publication was “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations,” Econometrica 50 (November 1982): 1345-70. Econometrica’s archives are available only to paid subscribers, but there is a copy at the Minneapolis Fed’s website, which also has many other articles by Prescott, some with Kydland. Central banking policy, not surprisingly, was another area of study for them, and “Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans” (Journal of Political Economy 85 (June 1977): 473-91) extended and quantified viagragen Friedman’s insight of monetary policy as a game between central bankers and rational actors in the economy, with the rational expectations of the players serving to anticipate and subvert the intentions of central policy.

    “Time to Build” is considered to be their most important work. It established technological disruptions as one of the drivers of the business cycle, with the lag time of bringing innovative capital assets on line contributing to the uneven effects. This is essentially a supply-side factor in business cycle analysis, and reinforces the futility of monetary fine-tuning.

    Does anyone else notice the similarity to Schumpeter’s thoughts on creative destruction?

    Update: I finally found an extract of the Nobel committee’s citation, which gives a layman’s explanation of their work and leaves all the horrid math out.

     

    5 Responses to “Economics Nobel”

    1. john enright Says:

      Prescott did spend some time at UC as a visiting prof. He also spent some time at Kellogg, which is in Evanston… but that’s not Chicago, is it?

      Today’s Trib:

      “He was a visiting professor at the U. of C’s economics department from 1978 to 1979 and was a University of Chicago faculty member from 1998 to 1999.

      “Prescott also spent three years at NU, first as a visiting professor at Weinberg College of Arts & Sciences from 1979 to 1980, then as a finance professor at the Kellogg School of Management from 1980 to 1982.”

      Link to Trib article

    2. Richard A. Heddleson Says:

      That should be good enough for the tee shirt.

    3. Lex Says:

      Hell yes it’s enough for the t-shirt.

    4. sms Says:

      i think ed’s ties with stokey and lucas earn him a spot in the chicago skool

    5. psikeyhackr Says:

      Link