Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links

  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...

  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

    • «
    »

    Hanson vs Hanson

    Posted by David Foster on February 14th, 2013 (All posts by )

    The Decline of America

    America’s Bright Future

     

    Both links via Common Sense & Wonder

     

    This entry was posted on Thursday, February 14th, 2013 at 9:53 am and is filed under Civil Society, Economics & Finance, History, Political Philosophy, Politics, USA. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    6 Responses to “Hanson vs Hanson”

    1. Jonathan Says:
      February 14th, 2013 at 11:11 am

      Maybe he wrote one piece in the morning and the other late in the evening.

    2. Mike Doughty Says:
      February 14th, 2013 at 11:21 am

      Politics vs. potential.

    3. Cris Says:
      February 14th, 2013 at 11:32 am

      2012 election hangover? One minute I would think, “We can’t lose.” The next minute, “We’re screwed.”
      Same now. A lot depends on the next few years as to whether things work themselves out here at home in an orderly, democratic manner or some people get pantsed.

    4. Subotai Bahadur Says:
      February 14th, 2013 at 2:28 pm

      Much of Hanson’s optimism in “America’s Bright Future” is based on his citations of economic statistics compared to other countries. With all due respect, those figures are massaged to the point where they are as true as the scripted events on an MTV reality show.

      Unemployment is stated as artificially low, because they keep lowering the size of the labor force it is a fraction of by dropping the unemployed from the books. Or like today’s figures, not including several states and “estimating” their unemployment. Or use of “birth/death” estimates of undetected businesses created to boost reported employment. Every optimistic figure announced is revised later as being much worse.

      Real GDP is the raw GDP minus inflation. Inflation is measured by using a “basket” of prices for certain things. That basket has been changed administratively to reduce the weight of the costs of food and energy [been to a grocery store, a gas station, or opened an electric/gas bill lately?] and to increase the weight of housing costs [with home values collapsing] to factor in the equivalent of buying a home every month. Thus technically we have a fractional percentage increase in GDP monthly.

      But if you use the same standards as during the Bush 43 term, we have unemployment in the range of 14-16%, not the 7.9% claimed. Similarly our real inflation rate is 8-10%, which when subtracted from the GDP growth gives a negative number. For a long time. As in we are and have been in a depression masked by transfer payments and government statistical lies.

      Subotai Bahadur

    5. Michael Kennedy Says:
      February 14th, 2013 at 6:02 pm

      My reaction to the column was, “Just think if Romney had won the election.”

      He didn’t and I can see a thousand ways Obama will kill this economy. Most of them are more likely than not.

    6. David Foster Says:
      February 14th, 2013 at 7:16 pm

      Bookworm just attended a luncheon at which Hanson spoke about America’s future, and has a post here.

    «
    »