History Friday – Log Cabin Days

Among the tall stack of books which I read in the matter of research for writing my adventures set on the Texas frontier was one titled  Texas Log Buildings; A Folk Architecture which has actually proved to be a bit more interesting and informative than it looked at first glance. I am a sucker for knowing how things are constructed or put together- which is good, especially  when I needed  to write a description of building such a thing as a log house; details like how many days it would take so many men to  build one, what size it would generally be, and the layout these little details add convincing detail. Until I read that book, the only  description of the process that I could bring readily to mind was in  Little House on the Prairie and it turns out that Pa Ingalls was not building that cabin to much of a standard. He may not even have been all that skilled as a carpenter, but since he was working on it mostly by himself, and in a place where the swiftness of getting a roof of some sort over his family counted for everything allowances were made.


That was almost everyone’s first and most urgent need, upon settling on a new grant or homestead, that and planting some kind of crop in the ground; building a cabin, to meet immediate shelter needs. This book differentiates very clearly the difference between a log cabin, and a log house. A log cabin was small; twelve to fourteen foot square, windowless, and with a dirt floor. They were scratch and hastily put up to use as a temporary dwelling place, whereas a log house was larger, permanent, and much more carefully constructed; even quite elaborate as to comforts. For much of the 19th century, at least in Texas it was a matter of some embarrassment to still be living in a log cabin after a couple of years; rather like living in a trailer would be. In fact, many log houses were covered with siding and paint as soon as their owners could afford to do so. If they had lived in a little cabin before building the permanent house, the cabin was frequently reused as a smoke-house, or a stable.

Pace Little House and a whole raft of western movies, I’d always visualized such houses and cabins built out of the whole, rounded logs, with simple interlocking half-round notches (called a saddle notch) cut close to the ends, and about a foot or so of the log hanging out beyond at the corners, rather like a “Lincoln-log” house. This method of construction turns out have been employed by the relatively unskilled and/or those in a tearing hurry. The majority of Texas log structures were built of timbers which had been at least roughly shaped on two sides, and carefully notched at the ends to make a square corner. With the exception of part log, part dugout shelters built in far western Texas, where trees were scarce, most log structures were also raised off the ground on corner piers, to prevent rot and termite infestation, and to take advantage of air circulation.

Logs were prepped before construction, either by rough-hewing — cutting a shallow straight face on two opposite sides, or “planking”— cutting a thick plank out of the center of the log. In a very small number of cases, each log would be square-hewn, on all four sides, resulting in a heavy, square beam. More usually, only the bottom log — the sill, and the topmost, the “plate” which supported the roof rafters would be squared. These logs would usually be the largest; if the structure was to have a wooden floor, the sills would be mortised, with the floor joists lap-jointed into them. Sometimes a third sill would be added, for extra support.

A log house went up pretty fast, apparently, once all the timbers had been cut and prepped: the book gives an estimate of two men working two days for a fairly simple, square (single pen) structure, and three men working three days for a more elaborate one. (In Daughter of Texas, one chapter describes a ‘house-raising’, where the men of Gonzales raise a two-pen house in a single day, since all the logs and roof-shingles have already been cut and prepped.) Roofs were usually constructed with the gable-ends on the sides of a two-slope roof, with pairs of rafters lap-jointed or mortised together at the roof-ridge, at about a 45-degree angle. Long laths or slats run cross-ways between the rafters. Most log houses were roofed with cut shingles. Porches and sheds attached at a later date would usually have a shallower roof line, described as a “witches’ hat” in silhouette.

Doors and windows were cut in the walls after basic construction was completed. They were neither large nor numerous, since cutting them weakened the structure. The carpenters would set wedges into the spaces between the logs to prevent them sagging, and cut vertically until the desired size was reached. Then a door or window frame of planks would be nailed or pegged into place to stabilize the cut logs. Another reason for having a minimum of windows in many parts of Texas, especially in the early days was the ever-present danger of Indian attacks. A number of houses from that time actually had so-called shooting holes, two or three in each wall. Windows were secured with wooden shutters; before glass was available, the window opening were filled with oiled paper or thin-scraped oiled rawhide, which admitted some light.

In all but a handful of log houses made from carefully fitted hewn timbers, there was a gap between each log which needed to be filled in order to make the house weather-tight. Since so many houses would have been built with new timber it was necessary to allow for shrinkage and warping, as well as the natural taper of the logs. The gaps might be filled with thin slats nailed or driven into place, flat pieces of stone and mortar, or clay mixed with animal hair, straw, or moss or just plain mud. In a house built of logs which had been roughly hewn, bark left on the top and bottom helped the chinking material adhere to the rough surface in between logs.

About the most common floor plans for log houses in Texas was called a “dog-trot,” or “dog-run”; two single-pen rooms with a covered but open breezeway in between. Sometimes each room had it’s own fireplace; but many house built after the Civil War did not have fireplaces at all, since metal stoves had become so widely available for heating and cooking. Quite a few houses originally built with fireplaces were retrofitted with stoves and the chimneys and fireplaces removed. Larger windows were cut when glass became cheaper and more widely available.

In later years, many log houses were added onto, or covered with siding; after all, there was a whiff of poverty attached to living in such a house and sometimes it is hard to tell, at a casual glance, that there is a log house underneath the siding and plaster, the porch added at the front, and the shed kitchen on the back. Keeping this book in mind, I have spotted old log houses lurking in many places – even in suburban San Antonio – and often, still in use as residences, altho often they have been added onto since they were first built.

(Originally posted at my Celia Hayes book blog)

15 thoughts on “History Friday – Log Cabin Days”

  1. There used to be an old dugout/rock house right off Hwy 67 near a little ghost town called Benoit in Runnels County. It was dug into the side of a small hill. About 100 ft away was a more modern woodframe rock home that was still in use into the 1990’s. The last time I went through there this year, it looks unoccupied and has been for some time as the mesquite brush is taking over the property.

    My maternal grandfather used to talk about the old dugout his parents had on their property in Howard County when they first settled there in the 1880’s. As a kid he and his siblings used to play in it a lot.

  2. Not to worry, Joe.
    I am sure that there were a lot of home-sites where there was first a simple dug-out or cabin, and then the main and permanent house. Right off the top of my head, there is a lovely one in Bulverde; the Settlement, which has a mid-19th century small stone house (which was the biggest in Bulverde for years), and large stone barn … and then a late 19th-early 20th cottage a few feet away.

  3. I had read about the dust bowl, and the structures there were downright primitive compared even to a log house (or cabin) – the sod house – and this was in the 20th century.

    But then, no mortgage to worry about!

    My late uncle had a family farm in WV that was a modern house, but over the decades it was 1 log house) – built 1820 – then an adjoining one – to the point in the 1930s or so they built 2 baths and bedrooms adjoining the log houses –

  4. Sgt Mom, I was just in the Santa Fe History Museum, and there is a huge exhibit on the works of Karl May…includes some clips from one of the movies (loosely) based on the books, “Winnetou” in German and “Apache Gold” in English.

    How are your German translations coming along?

  5. Yes – there were a lot of houses which started with a core of one or two log rooms, and then … just got added onto. In my books, the Vining house in Austin begins as a two-room-and-a-loft blockhouse, and then the back and front porches are closed in to make rooms, and then over the next three decades there is a grand extension to the front, and a wing on either side … and finally, it is a large, rambling mansion with porches and verandas all the way around…
    One thing I gathered from this book – is that very often, the original cabin could be knocked apart and the logs re-used for something else, or the house could be hoisted up onto sledges and moved entire.

  6. Hi, David – the German translation of the first book is selling (it was completed in November last), but just barely – not enough that I can ask Lukas to do the next book on spec, since we are sharing the profits from sales. Damn this economic downturn! I might see if I can connect with the Santa Fe History Museum though … I do very well, selling my books through museum shops.

  7. Yes, you should try the SF museum.

    I’m curious how you are marketing the German version?

    There do some to be a lot of Germans who are total American West fanatics. There was an article in one of the local Santa Fe magazines a few months back which was kind of a hit piece on Karl May…a couple of months later, there was a letter from a German woman who had always dreamed of visiting the American West after reading May’s books, finally came and lived in Santa Fe for a while and loved it, said the landscape was just as May had described even though he’d never actually been here.

  8. My grandmother lived in a sod house in Texas as a girl, then went with her family to Oklahoma in one of the land runs.

  9. That was very interesting to read. It is also a nice reminder of how hard people had to work to own the most basic comforts, like a roof over one’s head. I think most of us would die like dogs if we were forced to work that hard. I know I would.

  10. Katherine – I have had a good frined since childhood – who is a regular “Grizzle Adams” kind of character. He doesn’t live in a log cabin but is an avid hunter. And he made the point that the average suburbanite would die if left out in the elements to fend for themselves.

    I suspect a small percentage would learn what they needed to survive but most would be in big trouble.

    They usually didn’t worry about weight or cholesterol in those days either – back breaking work from sunup to sundown.

  11. In Perry, Florida the “Forest Capital State Park” offers an example of late 1800 “dogtrot” construction and living: http://www.floridastateparks.org/forestcapital/

    We visited there a couple of years ago. These folks had developed their lifestyle to a pretty fine point. Note the chimneys at either end and the detached cooking kitchen with yet another chimney as far away from the main house as possible. Perry is about 120 miles N. of Tampa, 5 or 10 miles from the Gulf of Mexico.

    Pictures:

    http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/photos/arts/crackr/crackr.htm

  12. Those dovetail joints at the corners are a real carpentry challenge. Each surface is sloped to drain water to the outside so the wood won’t rot due to water trapped in the joint. Amazingly, the pioneers did all that with axes and adzes.

  13. “Yes – there were a lot of houses which started with a core of one or two log rooms, and then ”¦ just got added onto. ”

    In the San Juan Islands of Puget Sound is a lovely place called the “Roche Harbor Resort. The hotel began as a log cabin and the inner walls are exposed in a couple of places to show the construction. Teddy Roosevelt signed the guestbook. The rose gardens are magnificent about now. San Juan Island is in the “Banana Belt” so the rain fall is less than Seattle.

    The hotel is a rather extreme example of what you describe.

  14. Yes, John – cutting and assembling the dovetail joints so they would lock together and shed water was a real skill, and I think that might have been why such structures were taken apart and repurposed so readily. There was a fair amount of work going into each one; so why not save yourself time and trouble by using the cut and faced timbers again.
    Mike and Tyouth – I loved the links; yes, this is exactly what would happen, with a well-built log house. As a family prospered and a business demanded – of course it would be added onto. I see it in a couple of log buildings that I know of, locally.

Comments are closed.