Posted by Jonathan on July 26th, 2007 (All posts by Jonathan)
Chicagoboyz are inclusive.
This entry was posted on Thursday, July 26th, 2007 at 11:15 pm and is filed under Humor, Photos.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
July 26th, 2007 at 11:45 pm
Is it the case: Chicks = chiks = “chiks”?
Or are there subtle differences I am not aware of?
July 26th, 2007 at 11:58 pm
Wit, tact, spelling — pick any two.
July 27th, 2007 at 12:12 am
Easy: Wit and tact. Speling is not imporetant.
July 27th, 2007 at 5:35 am
Know phat chix.
July 27th, 2007 at 9:03 am
!
July 27th, 2007 at 9:26 am
Biblically?
July 27th, 2007 at 5:46 pm
“chicas”?
July 28th, 2007 at 2:04 pm
Maybe he didn’t want any babes in burqas and meant to write ‘no fatwah chiks’.
July 28th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
!!
July 29th, 2007 at 7:36 am
Is that pixelated plate from Florida?
July 29th, 2007 at 10:02 am
Astute question, John! If it’s a Florida plate, maybe he’s a Seminole and doesn’t want to give rides to overweight Chickasaw gals.
July 29th, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Yeah, Florida. The driver was a young white guy, ethnicity unknown but I would guess Anglo or Cuban. Since I’m making fun of him I see no reason to risk identifying him by displaying his license-plate number.
July 30th, 2007 at 5:28 pm
I just saw a pickup here in Madison with a “No Fat Chicks” bumper sticker. I must be missing out on something because I have no clue what it is all about.
July 31st, 2007 at 11:23 am
Well, Dan from Madison and Jonathan, intrigued,I Googled No Fat Chiks and sure enough, dozens of references.
It look as though – I could be wrong – this is some porn deal or gangsta rapper. But how very outré …
July 31st, 2007 at 12:29 pm
Thanks, Verity!