Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
    Loading
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • The Anti-Brian Lambs

    Posted by Ginny on March 12th, 2008 (All posts by )

    At WSJ we see what a free market of ideas is – and what it isn’t. There, too, Strassel describes an elitist (sentimental, self-righteous) press which quickly bought the argument of yet another politician that he (and he alone) is “for the people” (“for the children” and “for the poor” are of course versions of this); that this populist argument leads inexorably to power-grabbing hubris should be clear by now. Self-righteousness is a dangerous drug because it so easily quiets not just others’ doubts but our own. Spitzer is an argument, of course, for checks and balances applied by a free press. But we might also remember that any call to our baser instinct to covet another’s success should be suspect.

    Update:    Gay Patriot  suggests three offices often obviously motivated by something other than justice:  Spitzer, Nifong and Ronnie Earle, who began earliest and remains in office.  That may say something about Austin and I’m not sure it is good. The “Free Market link” is to “Paris Book Burning” – a description of the boycott of a Paris book fair by Muslim nations:

    The richness of Israeli society, as shown through its thriving arts scene, makes an illusive target for such venom. Joining Amos Oz and Aharon Appelfeld in the national delegation of 39 writers in Paris will be Israeli Arabs Sayed Kashua and Naim Araidi.
     
    An Israeli Jewish poet, Aaron Shabtai, declined the invitation. “I don’t think that a state that maintains an occupation, that every day commits crimes against civilians, deserves to be invited to a week devoted to culture. That’s anti-cultural.” Working in the Middle East’s most vibrant democracy, Mr. Shabtai is free to make his choice and publicly proclaim it.
     
    His peers in the Muslim world don’t have that privilege. Moroccan novelist Abdelouahab Errami told Le Journal du Dimanche of his “disappointment” at the boycott. “I don’t share the position of my government. But I won’t go…. It is difficult to have a different individual position without exposing yourself to a campaign of pressure.”

    An excerpt from Strassel:

    There’s little that’s tragic about Mr. Spitzer, unless you consider his victims (which would appear to include his own family). The press would do well to meditate on that, and consider how many violations they winked at and validated over the years. Politicians don’t exist to be idolized by the press, at least not by any press corps doing its job.

     

    4 Responses to “The Anti-Brian Lambs”

    1. Jonathan Says:

      The press would do well to meditate on that, and consider how many violations they winked at and validated over the years.

      If they were meditative they probably would not have gone into journalism. Instead they are ambitious, competitive, and devoted to a facile worldview in which journalists are inherently agents of good, articulated intentions trump real-world outcomes and unfettered access to powerful people is an important index of professional accomplishment.

    2. Ginny Says:

      unfettered access – included in this subheading is, of course, Saddam Hussein.

    3. renminbi Says:

      The WSJ and the NY Post reported what Spitzer was doing as AG but the public was not interested in seeing this. The other media were pretty much worthless in reporting or pointing out what was happening. In fact they condoned this thuggishness. I look forward to the day the stupid and vile poseurs they employ are forced to do something useful like flipping burgers at Mickey D’s ,while most newspapers go out of business.

    4. Saint Patton Says:

      Media are still businesses at their core and will cater to what they see as a prime audience. On the other hand, if they get it wrong and fail to account for demographic trends then they will suffer. The NYT is dying for a reason, because they are failing to notice their core constituency of die-hards is dying off.