Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Big Week Day 3, Feb 22, 1944, Plus 75 Years

    Posted by Trent Telenko on February 22nd, 2019 (All posts by )

    Today marks the 75th Anniversary of the third day of Operation Argument otherwise known as BIG WEEK.  On Tuesday, February 22, 1944 the 15th Air Force went after the Luftwaffe in the skies over Germany — with the 8th Air Force operations being heavily disrupted by fog — in the battle for air superiority before the Normandy invasion scheduled for June 1944.

    The idea for Operation Argument was to force the Luftwaffe fighter force to fight by attacking targets they had to defend — the German aircraft industry — with fighter escorted bombers.

    The 15th Air Force attacked without fighter escorts.

    Oops.

    These were the results of the 3rd day of combat —

     

    Day Three of “Big Week” combat results from “Coming of Aerial Armageddon” by Dr. John Curatola

    ETO Strategic Operations

    Mission 230: “Big Week” continues with 799 aircraft dispatched against German aviation and Luftwaffe airfields; 41 bombers and 11 fighters are lost.

     

    1. 289 B-17s are dispatched against aviation industry targets at Aschersleben (34 bomb), Bernburg (47 bomb) and Halberstadt (18 bomb) in conjunction with a Fifteenth Air Force raid on Regensburg, Germany; 32 hit Bünde, 19 hit Wernigerode, 15 hit Magdeburg, 9 hit Marburg and 7 hit other targets of opportunity; they claim 32-18-17 Luftwaffe aircraft; 38 B-17s are lost, 4 damaged beyond repair and 141 damaged; casualties are 35 KIA, 30 WIA and 367 MIA.
    2. 333 B-17s are dispatched to Schweinfurt but severe weather prevents aircraft from forming properly and they are forced to abandon the mission prior to crossing the enemy coast; 2 B-17s are damaged.
    3. 177 B-24s are dispatched but they are recalled when 100 miles (160 km) inland; since they were over Germany, they sought targets of opportunity but strong winds drove the bombers over The Netherlands and their bombs hit Enschede, Arnhem, Nijmegen and Deventer; they claim 2-0-0 Luftwaffe aircraft; 3 B-24s are lost and 3 damaged; casualties are 30 MIA. About 900 civilians were killed, mainly in the bombing of Nijmegen. In 1984, the book De Fatale Aanval (“The Fatal Attack”), was written about this by eyewitness Alphons Brinkhuis, who was a 10-year-old boy at Enschede when it happened.

     

    These missions are escorted by 67 P-38s, 535 Eighth and Ninth Air Force P-47s, and 57 Eighth and Ninth Air Force P-51s; the P-38s claim 1 Luftwaffe aircraft destroyed, 1 P-38 is damaged beyond repair and 6 are damaged; the P-47s claim 39-6-15[clarification needed] Luftwaffe aircraft, 8 P-47s are lost and 12 damaged, 8 pilots are MIA; the P-51s claim 19-1-10 Luftwaffe aircraft, 3 P-51s are lost and 3 damaged, 3 pilots are MIA.

     

    MTO Strategic Operations

     

    B-17s attack Petershausen marshaling yard and Regensburg aircraft factory in Germany and the air depot at Zagreb, Yugoslavia; a large force of B-24s hits Regensburg aircraft plants about the same time as the B-17 attack; other B-24s pound the town of Sibenik and the harbor at Zara, Yugoslavia; they claim 40 Luftwaffe aircraft destroyed; 13 bombers are lost.

    For extensive background, see this Wikipedia article, where the passage above came from:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Week

    Exposing the Bomber General Lies in the “P-51 Narrative”

    For all the good that the P-47 Thunderbolt did in Europe’s strategic bombing offensive,  it has been written out of the victory narrative for a lot of political reasons.  Political reasons starting with answering for the 26,000 men who died in the 8th Air Force in WW2 because of the flawed doctrines of the the USAAF Bomber Generals.  A number of combat deaths that is larger than the entire US Marine Corps in World War 2 from Pearl Harbor to Hiroshima.

    I’ve written expansively on how these flawed doctrines affected the development of  auxiliary drop tank technology, the escort fighters that used them and the bomber escort doctrine that knit them together over the years on Chicagoboyz,  See these posts:

    History Friday — MacArthur’s Fighter Drop Tanks
    Posted by Trent Telenko on July 12th, 2013
    https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/37362.html

     

    History Friday: Deconstructing the P-51 Mustang Historical Narrative
    Posted by Trent Telenko on September 27th, 2013
    https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/38801.html

     

    History Friday — Revisiting the P-51 Mustang Historical Narrative
    Posted by Trent Telenko on December 16th, 2016
    https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/54434.html

    Right now I’m going to show you how Generals Arnold, Spaatz, Anderson and the rest of the “Bomber General Mafia” put the bad mouth on the P-47’s role in obtaining air superiority over Europe.

    The P-47 Variants that Won Big Week & The Lies About Them

    The 8th Air Force bomber escort doctrine deployed during Big Week required fighters with drop tanks to be used in three shifts to cover the bomber formations during

    1. Penetration of enemy air space,
    2. At the target area and
    3. During withdrawal

    The three shift fighter escort doctrine allowed USAAF fighters to drop external fuel tanks and dog fight for 30 minutes with full engine power with German fighters, while still protecting the bombers. Enemy fighters that attacked American fighters were not attacking US bombers, and enemy pilots dying in such fights did not come back to kill anything.

    During the first three days of Big Week the numerical fighter composition of the “Target” or “Deep Escort” shift of the escort doctrine — since the P-38 and P-51 were used 100% in the “Deep” missions —  looked something like as follows:

     

    The Numerical Fighter Composition of the February 20, 1944 Deep Escort Shift. Bar Charts by Trent Telenko

    The Numerical Fighter Composition of the February 21, 1944 Deep Escort Shift. Bar Charts by Trent Telenko

    The Numerical Fighter Composition of the February 22, 1944 Deep Escort Shift. Bar Charts by Trent Telenko

    The lie the Bomber Generals planted on the P-47’s reputation was that it was too short ranged to make it to the deep bomber targets and that the P-51 flying that deep escort mission was what broke the Luftwaffe’s back.  This “P-51 Narrative” absolved them of the Bomber Generals of accountability for their failed doctrines and poor decisions prior to the P-51’s arrival.

    And as a political strategy, it worked.  These maps were how they did it.

    FIGHTER RANGE Map 10 — Source “Carl A. Spaatz and the Air War in Europe”

    The map above came from the following report: “EIGHTH AIR FORCE TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 1942-MAY 1945” It was prepared by Eighth Air Force and Army Air Forces Evaluation Board.

     

    8TH AIR FORCE ESCORT FIGHTER RANGE CHART — Source “EIGHTH AIR FORCE TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 1942-MAY 1945, page 97

    When you do a close up of the P-47 range map you see this:

    P-47 Escort Radius, Source: “EIGHTH AIR FORCE TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 1942-MAY 1945, page 97”

    When you look closely at the escort radius map above, what you -DO NOT- see is the range of a P-47 with a pair of 150 gallon drop tanks.  Nor do you see a range for a P-47 with a pair of 108 gallon wing tanks an a belly 75 Gallon tank.  Nor do you see the P-47 with a pair of 108 gallon wing tanks and a 150 gallon belly tank.

    P-47s were flown with all three combinations.  None were in that P-47 escort radius map shown above.

    See the next three photos:

    A 1943 ferry flight of a “Razor back” P-47D in Iceland with the early 150-Gallon version of the Lockheed drop tank.  Source: Page 16 “P-47 Thunderbolt in Action” Aircraft Number 67, Squadron/signal Publications”

     

    Three 345th FS, 350th FG, P-47D-27 “bubble canopy” Thunderbolts with two wing mounted 110 gallon and one belly mounted 75 gallon drop tanks.  Source: “THUNDERBOLT: a documentary history of the Republic P-47”

    What you see here is a 56th Fighter Group P-47 with a pair of UK built 108 gallon paper fuel tanks and a UK built 150 gallon belly tank. The P-47 could not use the US built Lockheed 150 gallon drop tank on it’s belly. Source : Jan Zdiarsky’s “Drop Tanks USAAF” Info Edward, March 2016 Link:
    http://www.avia-it.com/act/cera_una_volta/echi/CUV_Echi_2016/Seg_art_giu_16/Drop_Tanks_USAAF.pdf

    When you pull up the text of  page 97 up in that Eighth Air Force and Army Air Forces Evaluation Board report and closely, you find the following:

    P-47 Escort Radius (ETO Narrative Text) Source: “EIGHTH AIR FORCE TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 1942-MAY 1945” on page 97

    So you see in the text above that one unspecified P-47 variant with a single belly 150 gallon wing tanks reach 430 miles as an bomber escort.  Another unspecified P-47 variant with a pair of 150 gallon tanks could escort to 475 miles. And a final unspecified P-47 variant could range beyond Berlin when engaged in fighter sweeps ahead of a bomber stream with a pair of 150 gallon tanks.

    So…which P-47s were the Bomber Generals talking about?

    Not All P-47Ds Are Created Equal

    There were a lot of different P-47D variants used in the Combined Bomber Offensive.  All the “D” variants had wings with drop tank plumbing, but not all of them had the most powerful R-2800-59 or 63 engines, “big paddle” propellers or extra internal fuel tankage that provided the longest range.

    This is a variant list of Big Week P-47Ds that I researched at the 368th Fighter Group and Joe Baugher web sites:

    http://www.368thfightergroup.com/P-47-2.html

    http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/p47_4.html

    P-47D-15-RE Razor back, Drop Tank Wings*

    P-47D-20-RE Razor Back, “Universal” Drop Tank wings & R-2800-59 engine introduced
    P-47D-22-RE Razor back, Jettisonable cockpit canopy, Paddle-bladed propeller, increased internal fuel from 305 to 370 gallons  
    P-47D-23-RA Razor back, Jettisonable cockpit canopy, Paddle-bladed propeller, increased internal fuel
    P-47D-25-RE Bubble canopy
    P-47D-26-RA Bubble canopy 

     

    Farmingdale, NY built (-RE serial numbers)

    Evansville, IN built (-RA serial numbers)

     

    *Bold in the text above shows the variant where the item introduced became P-47 standard equipment.

    Hunting down the range of the various P-47Ds in the target/deep escort roles was not easy, but please see the following for the P-47D-15-RE.

    P-47D-15-RE had a 450 mile deep escort radius of action in Eglin field tests using full 305 gallon internal fuel load with a pair of 150 Gallon Tanks filled to 270 gallons total. Source: ARMY AIR FORCES BOARD PROJECT NO. (T) 5f “FINAL REPORT ON LONG RANGE FIGHTER ESCORT CAPABILITIES OF THE P-47D-15” 13 April 1944

    The photo above is from the shorter range 305 gallon internal fuel version of the P-47D available to the 8th Air Force in February 1944.  There were also a number of the P47D25, with 370 gallons of internal fuel, available to 8th Air Force. 

    According to Joe Baugher, regards the  P-47D-25 and P-47D-26 test variants without the extra internal fuel:

    Ordinarily the AAF would have given such a radical modification as that which produced the bubble-canopy Thunderbolt a completely new variant letter, or perhaps even a new type number. However, they chose instead to simply give it a new production block number in the D-series. Consequently, the first batches to feature this new bubble canopy were Farmingdale’s P-47D-25-RE and Evansville’s P-47D-26-RA. Those batches also had the R-2800-59 or -63 engines, the paddle-bladed propeller, and the “universal” wing. Stronger belly shackles capable of carrying a 110-gal drop tank were fitted which, together with the 305-gal main fuselage tank, an 100-gal auxiliary fuel tank and two 150-gal underwing tanks, made possible a maximum range of 1,800 miles at 195 mph at 10,000′.

    The usual way of determining “radius of action it to divide by 1/3.  Joe Baugher‘s number above means a radius of action of 600 miles for the P-47D-25 with three drop tanks (one 110 gallon belly tank and two 150 gallon wing tanks)  and the limited 305 gallon internal fuel tank.

    A few weeks after Big Week, the USAAF conducted a series of tests at Eglin field to determine the ranges of the P-38L, P-47D-25 (with 370 gallon internal tanks) and P-51D-20 in escorting the B-29 for operations in the Pacific.

    These were the results:

    Army Air Force Board
    FIGHTER COVER FOR VLR OPERATIONS  
    PROJECT 03786C37313 
    12 Mar 1945
    .
     
    III. CONCLUSIONS.-It is concluded that:
    .
    a. The employment of long range fighter aircraft as bombardment
    escort in the Pacific Theater of Operations is feasible.
    .
    b. The P-51D-20 aircraft, equipped with two (2) 75-gallon drop tanks and using recommended engine settings., has an 800-mile radius of action. 
    .
    c. The P47D25 aircraft, equipped with two (2) 165-gallon drop tanks and using recommended engine settings, has an 800-mile radius of action.
    .
    d. The P-38J-5 and L aircraft, equipped with two (2) 165-gallon drop tanks and using recommended engine settings, has an 840-mile radius of action. Equipped with one (1) 300-gallon and one (1) 165-gallon drop tank, this aircraft has a radius of action of 950 miles wren the 165-gallon tank is retained over the target.
    Eglin Field later tested another version of the P-47 that never made it to Europe, the P-47N which had another 100 gallons of internal fuel in its wings, with the following results:
    P-47N
    900-mile radius of action
    Full Internal Fuel
    330 Gal External fuel (2×165 gal external tank)
    .
    P-47N
    1050-mile radius of action
    Full Internal Fuel
    440 Gal External fuel (2×165 gal and one 110 Gal external tank)
    .
    P-47N
    1100-mile radius of action
    Full internal fuel
    630 Gal external fuel (2×310 gal drop tanks overloaded by 5-gal ea.)
    European Theater map with all the above B-29 fighter escort test radii of action placed on it look like this:

    FIGHTER RANGE MAP WITH B-29 TEST RESULTS*— adapted from Paul Kennedy’s “Engineers of Victory”

    *Note:  All of the above radii of action in the map are equivalent of VIIIth Fighter Command “target flight profiles” from the “three shift” fighter escort doctrine. That is, fighters were below 25,000 feet to burn up their external fuel tanks contents at “long of lean” fuel rating before they climbed to the 25,000 foot bomber stream altitude 1/2 hour from target.

    So know you know how the Bomber Generals embedded their self-serving lies about the ETO fighter escort story into the historical record World War 2.

    -End-

     

    9 Responses to “Big Week Day 3, Feb 22, 1944, Plus 75 Years”

    1. Sam L. Says:

      Have you read “BLOOD and FEARS” by Kevin Wilson on the bombing campaign?

    2. Gavin Longmuir Says:

      “Big Week” continues with 799 aircraft dispatched …

      Just think about the manufacturing capacity the US had in the 1940s to allow daily continuing operations on that scale! Think … and weep.

      The operating assumption today (especially among the “Buy the World a Coke” crowd) is that total war will never happen again. Even realists generally seem to assume that total war would mean nuclear Armageddon — all over in a couple of hours, end of story.

      Some pessimists take the view that the fighting will not stop once the relatively small number of (hard to restock) high tech weapons are fired off — and the world finds out that nuclear war is not as totally destructive as the Loonie Left has claimed. Then we human beings will follow the same track as our ancestors. The Carthaginians did not stop fighting the Romans after the First Punic War, or even after the Second. The English did not stop fighting after the Blitz, nor did the Germans stop fighting after Dresden. After the brief nuclear holocaust, the survivors will carry on fighting with less high-tech (and more quickly constructed) weapons. Advantage China, with its massive industrial capacity!

      The “free trade”/offshore all manufacturing crowd will end up with a lot of blood on their hands.

    3. Renminbi Says:

      So, “history” is often the lies that have not been corrected. Thank-you for this corrective. The old narrative did not feel quite right.

    4. Trent Telenko Says:

      >>So, “history” is often the lies that have not been corrected.

      Got it in one.

    5. Trent Telenko Says:

      >>Have you read “BLOOD and FEARS” by Kevin Wilson on the bombing campaign?

      I’ve not gotten to it.

    6. Mike K Says:

      When I was a boy, I saw a movie about P 47 and drop tanks. It was “Fighter Squadron” and the story was about drop tanks.

      1948. I was 10.

    7. Trent Telenko Says:

      Mike K,

      It’s posted in full on youtube right now, at least until the rights holder’s sends a letter to Google about that.

      See here

      Fighter Squadron Full Movie 1948

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOiiSRHXkS8

    8. Mike K Says:

      “Video Unavailable.”

      It Was the last movie I can remember my father going to.

    9. Trent Telenko Says:

      I’ve updated this post with a photo of a 56th Fighter Group P-47 with a pair of UK built 108 gallon paper fuel tanks and a UK built 150 gallon belly tank.

      The range of this P-47 drop tank combination was also left out of that 8th Air Force fighter escort radius of action map.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.