Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Seth Barrett Tillman: North Wales Poll for May 23, 2019 EU Parliament Elections

    Posted by Jonathan on April 25th, 2019 (All posts by )

    UKIP + BREXIT Party = 50%.
    Labour + Tory = 8%

    Read the full post.


    6 Responses to “Seth Barrett Tillman: North Wales Poll for May 23, 2019 EU Parliament Elections

    1. Grurray Says:

      I joined the Brexit Party a couple weeks ago. It’s easy to sign up. We all should do it.

      I know it’s a symbolic gesture for us in the States. However, after watching the despicable parliamentary proceedings, the unconscionable betrayals, and the vile press coverage, I felt that I had to register my support in some way.

      I see a lot of people complaining that it’s a one-trick pony or a stunt. They’re running candidates in the European elections before even formulating an official party platform. I say, who needs a platform when you have a crisis like this? The Torys have proven they can’t deliver Brexit with May as PM, and they can’t get rid of her either.

      Something else has to be tried. Brexit is the single most important issue in the United Kingdom, and I believe it will become the most important development in the English speaking world in our lifetimes.

      Bismark supposedly (but probably not) once quipped that the most significant event of the 20th century will be that the fact that the North Americans speak English. In the 21st century the most significant event will be that the British rediscover why.

    2. Gavin Longmuir Says:

      Well, it is a poll, and we all know about them. Separation from the EU is not so earth-shattering. Most of the UK’s problems have been home-grown all along, as shown by the “despicable parliamentary proceedings, the unconscionable betrayals, and the vile press coverage”. And the EU is destined to break up anyway.

      The interesting part is what follows separation, when the UK has to start negotiating deals with … who, exactly? The European countries are unlikely to make things easy. China is still looking for revenge for what England did to them in the Opium Wars. India has a whole cottage industry of academics arguing that England got fat by screwing India. Australia needs to stay on very good terms with their prime customer, China. Canada .. well, they are on the side of the Davoise. And any deal with the US had better be good for the US.

      Post-separation, will the Brits be prepared for a root & branch reorganization of their governance? Or will the same old failing Oxbridge metropolitan set stay in charge, leading the UK further down the road to irrelevancy? Time will tell.

    3. Grurray Says:

      China is still looking for revenge for what England did to them in the Opium Wars

      Yes well May has come up with a plan for that. She’s just gone and committed to a preemptive surrender and is inviting China in to spy on all Britons. This also has the added benefit of saving on the counter-espionage budget, so the UK will have more billions to pay to the EU when her Brexit deal reduces them to vassalage status.

    4. Mike Cunningham Says:

      Seth, you should maybe check on your philosophy of not monitoring comments upon your blog.

      I mean, are you really a fan of Dr. Ahmed?

    5. Anonymous Says:

      I bet not.


    6. Trent Telenko Says:

      The annihilation of both the Labour and the Tory Parties by “Heritage British” rural and urban working class voters in Wales would still not be enough to convince the pro-EU London elites they were wrong.

      This is an identity issue for those involved.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.