Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • A US political thought experiment

    Posted by TM Lutas on June 25th, 2019 (All posts by )

    Resolved: The US needs at least two political parties that can reliably be trusted to hold power without driving the US constitutional settlement into a ditch and risk civil war.

    Query: What are the names of the two (or more) parties?

    You’d think that this would be an easy thought experiment. What do you think is the percentage of the US population who couldn’t readily name two parties they fundamentally trust? Has that number been going up or down over the past decade?

     

    9 Responses to “A US political thought experiment”

    1. Grurray Says:

      The Quids and the Doughfaces.

      That is, steadfastness vs the bitter deception of moral disengagement. Or in the words of John Randolph of Roanoke, “providence moves slowly, but the devil always hurries.”

    2. TM Lutas Says:

      Current factions only please.

    3. Brian Says:

      I don’t think Pelosi and Schumer, for all their terrible policy ideas, are threats to thd Constitutional order. Nor are the traditional union movement types, since they know they need a functioning economy to survive. It’s the more local machine Dems, in combination with Alinskyite True Believers, who are the menace. So Obama with his leftism plus Chicago gangsterism, and younger California Dems with their nearly Maoist totalitarianism influences, and public sector unionists, are the danger. And they’re pushing us closer to the precipice because they don’t think the rest of us will ever reach a breaking point, because in their experience we never do.

    4. TM Lutas Says:

      Either the Democrats can be trusted with power ever again or we’re in need of a new center-left party. Either the Republicans can be trusted with power ever again or we’re in need of a new center-right party.

    5. Gavin Longmuir Says:

      It has been obvious for some time that the senior echelons of the Democrat Party are evil, and the senior echelons of the Republican Party are stupid. But the problem is not the Parties, the problem is us! We keep on voting for a bi-partisan Political Class which exploits and abuses us. There are far too many people who vote for one Party or the other out of tribal identity. Add in gerrymandering and too many “representatives” are effectively selected by small numbers of party members and then given jobs for life. They are NOT representative!

      Since the Parties have used their ability to write the Laws to dig themselves deeply entrenched positions, we are unlikely to see either Party collapse — and the barriers to entry for any new Party are significant. If we wanted to change the situation, we would have to start with some fairly dramatic modifications to the Constitution — changes to eliminate the emergence ever again of a semi-permanent Political Class (going much further than term limits) and the end of universal suffrage. But nothing will change until after the bankruptcy of federal, state, and city governments becomes impossible to ignore.

    6. TRX Says:

      Two trustworthy parties? As in, “can at least be arsed to do their predation out of public view”? I’m not seeing any…

      I am, however, beginning to understand how the citizens of the Weimar Republic felt when the Reichstag, pulled every-which-way by a dozen parties who were more interested in doing each other in than running the country, ceased to become a functioning government.

      Hopefully we can avoid what happened to them after that…

    7. Subotai Bahadur Says:

      We are really pretty much stuck in the early phases of the Second American Civil War.

      Both branches of what should be referred to as the UniParty have forgotten a critical set of details.

      1.) Every society has some form of Social Contract that holds it together.
      2.) If everybody is not bound by the same set of rules, accepted by everybody under that Social Contract, that society collapses as soon as enough people realize that following the rules means failure because of the inequality. The game is rigged.
      3.) For us the Social Contract is the Constitution and equality under the Rule of Law.
      4.) When those who rule us openly act as if they are not bound by or covered by the Constitution and rule of law, it means that the Social Contract is gone.
      5.) There is no intermediate step between a working Social Contract and violence in any society or culture. If you void the Social Contract, there will be violence until someone prevails to establish a new one. The terms of the new Contract may be neither equitable or free, but it will be enforceable.

      Subotai Bahadur

    8. Rich Rostrom Says:

      “The US needs at least two political parties that can reliably be trusted to hold power…”

      I don’t know of any working political party anywhere that could be so trusted. (“Working” to exclude splinter parties that never held office.) Political parties are like governments: necessary, but always to be monitored strictly.

    9. TMLutas Says:

      The level of trust that I’m talking about is at a very basic level, trusted to hand over power to their opponents when they lose an election.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.