Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Two On Kipling

    Posted by Assistant Village Idiot on March 21st, 2020 (All posts by )

    I made brief comments of my own, but these two links are mostly about What C S Lewis thought of Kipling, and what George Orwell thought of Kipling. Both more than a little surprising.


    5 Responses to “Two On Kipling”

    1. Roy Kerns Says:

      Lewis’ “That Hideous Strength” understood far more than did either Orwell’s “1984” or Huxley’s “Brave New World.” Lewis realized that reality includes a spiritual dimension.

      Orwell thought it was done by sticks (Big Brother’s power). Huxley thought carrots worked (soma, orgies.) Both wrote books after earlier championing socialism but then coming to see where it led. Both books end in despair, with no answer.

      Not so Lewis. He realized at root socialism attempts to make man into God, able to understand and control all. He not only agreed with Orwell and Huxley about a dismal end for socialism. He insisted it had to have that end. Only with an intervention beyond man could one avoid that end. His solution was faith.

    2. David Friedman Says:

      Orwell’s comments are in some ways perceptive, but note his reference to “his solitary novel, The Light that Failed.” Orwell does not know that Kipling wrote _Kim_, his one great novel, or even _Captains Courageous_, which would count as a pretty good book if it hadn’t been written by a world class author.

      And Orwell is, as usual, far too confident in his understanding of economics.

    3. David Friedman Says:

      Lewis is much better, in part because he has read much more Kipling. But one point struck me as a bit odd::.

      “His English countryside with its way of life is partly loved because American millionaires can’t understand it, aren’t in the know.”

      Part of the point of “An Habitation Enforced” is that the American millionaire, by the end, is in the know.

      Perhaps Lewis is thinking of a different story.

    4. BobtheRegisterredFool Says:

      Not impressed with the Orwell, and was skimming towards the end.

      Orwell seemed to be commenting as much on his own world as on Kipling, and maybe reading too much into things.

      As a modern American with little experience with Privates, and most of internet veteran contacts being NCOs or officers, I am inclined to believe in Privates who ‘get’ Kipling.

      Orwell might not have considered Kim or Captains Courageous to be true novels. Orwell in this essay seems to have very rigidly held ideas about divisions of humanity. People with the necessary innate qualities to produce literature being rarely found in the military, etc. His lack of charity for those on the other sides of those divisions seems no less offensive than a hypothetical person who believes it best to exterminate the foreigner, for the foreigner’s own benefit, as well as for that of domestic interests.

    5. PenGun Says:

      I was raised on Kipling. My first hero was Rikki Tikki Tavi and I loved the Jungle books, my motto is still “run and find out”. My favourite apart from the Jungle Books is How The Elephant Got His Trunk. So much spanking. ;)

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.