He said, “Yes We Can!” meaning, for each us, “Yes You Will!”
We answered, “No We Won’t!” saying, to each us, “Yes You Can!”
Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago School economists and fellow travelers.
He said, “Yes We Can!” meaning, for each us, “Yes You Will!”
We answered, “No We Won’t!” saying, to each us, “Yes You Can!”
Comments are closed.
Actually he said “Yes you will!”
Leading the People
A Political Speech: Troubling Times
…and what has the Libertarian or conservative groups offered instead? look at the mess we have after 8 years of bungling.
This is an argument? It’s what Buckley would call “stealing a base” – offering a sweeping statement we can all more or less accept (we’re in a mess) as proof of an equally sweeping but disputable conclusion (it was the libertarians who got us there). Q.E.D. Wasn’t that simple? We all do this, but liberals are especially prone because everything is self-evident to them. Argument is for sinners, not the righteous.
To Derf,
Democrats had a house and senate majority during the last two years of Bush’s presidency. What were the objections to Bush’s economic actions during that time?
The Dems pushed the policies that created the sub-prime lending bubble and following disaster. I hold Bush partly responsible because he failed to vigorously OPPOSE the Dem policies.
So, who is more blameable. The Dems who pushed the policies, or Bush who failed to stop them?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/president-obama-is-litera_b_166152.html
To Commenters:
Please do not respond further to the troll who wants to shift the discussion topic from Obama to Bush. Please also do not respond to this comment. Thanks.