Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • “Green Energy,” Crony Capitalism, and Nicholas Nickleby

    Posted by David Foster on January 14th, 2012 (All posts by )

    …an interesting piece here.


    7 Responses to ““Green Energy,” Crony Capitalism, and Nicholas Nickleby”

    1. Jonathan Says:

      David, there’s a problem with your link.

    2. David Foster Says:


    3. Dan from Madison Says:

      Interesting piece, but Shannon Love pretty much blew up the myth of the Great Railroad Land Giveaway:

    4. David Foster Says:

      The actions of the city government of Atlanta, in handing all vending on public property to a single company, bear a nontrivial resemblance to the muffin and crumpet operation of which Dickens wrote.

    5. Bill Brandt Says:

      There as always been some “crony capitalism” as long as there have been governments. But with the spending this govt has been doing the problem has become accentuated.

      Look at defense contracts. The Navy, because of their good experience with Grumman aircraft (they were known as the “Grumman Iron Works” ) – always favored Grumman when they needed a new plane. Would that be considered crony capitalism?

      I suppose that could be differentiated from , say, making a nice political contribution to getting a nice 500 million loan.

    6. Tatyana Says:

      Bill, for any contract there exist -theoretically – very detailed and transparent procedure of bidding. In private business “cronies” also happen, even when bidding requirements are followed to a “t”. There are several requirements to bidding companies before the bidding process starts that serve to filter out undesirables, from Owner’s point of view -the companies with insufficient insurance, those with less experience with similar projects, those with complains on their licenses or absent/fraudulent references. When government is in the role of the Owner, though, there appears whole different set of barriers, f.i. a Co has to be “shortlisted” before they are allowed to bid. Which in practice means lobbying of the most shameless kind. [I am trying to use neutral words here, you’d notice]

    7. Michael Kennedy Says:

      Douglas also built a lot of Navy planes. The famous SBD, the A3D and A4D when I worked for the company. McCain was flying an A4D when he was shot down.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.