Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
    Loading
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • 9/11 Plus Nine Years

    Posted by David Foster on September 11th, 2010 (All posts by )

    (This is basically a rerun and update of my posts from this day in 2006-2009. Some new links added this year are at the bottom of the post.)

    I am increasingly worried about our prospects for success in the battle against those who would destroy our civilization. America and the other democracies possess great military, economic, and intellectual strengths–but severe internal divisions threaten our ability to use these resources effectively.

    Within days of the collapse of the Towers, it started. “Progressive” demonstrators brought out the stilt-walkers, the Uncle Sam constumes, and the giant puppets of George Bush. They carried signs accusing America of planning “genocide” against the people of Afghanistan.

    Professors and journalists preached about the sins of Western civilization, asserting that we had brought it all on ourselves. A well-known writer wrote of her unease when her daughter chose to buy and display an American flag. Some universities banned the display of American flags in dormitories, claiming that such display was “provocative.”

    Opinions such as these have metastacized to the point at which they are no longer irrelevant to mainstream politics. Former DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe, along with other leading Democrats, attended a special screening of Michael Moore’s movie Farenheit 9/11. Moore is well-known for his outrageous statements about the country in which he lives–things he is credibly reported to have said include: “(Americans) are possibly the dumbest people on the planet . . . in thrall to conniving, thieving smug [pieces of the human anatomy],” (in an interview with the British newspaper The Mirror) and “That’s why we’re smiling all the time. You can see us coming down the street. You know, `Hey! Hi! How’s it going?’ We’ve got that big [expletive] grin on our face all the time because our brains aren’t loaded down” (to a crowd in Munich) and “You’re stuck with being connected to this country of mine, which is known for bringing sadness and misery to places around the globe.” (to a crowd in Cambridge, England.) And about the terrorists who are killing Americans and Iraqis on a daily basis in Iraq, Moore had this to say: “The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not `insurgents’ or `terrorists’ or `The Enemy.’ They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow — and they will win.”

    This is the individual who shared Jimmy Carter’s box at the Democratic National Convention, and who continues to be very popular in “progressive” circles.

    Imagine if a former President, in the midst of World War II, had embraced a man who spoke to foreign audiences about the stupidity of the American people and referred to our German and Japanese enemies as “heroes.” Imagine also that such attitudes had been openly embraced by a large part of the Republican Party leadership and by many well-known writers and entertainers. Could Franklin Roosevelt have led the nation to victory under such circumstances?

    And continuously, there has been the steady drip-drip-drip of moral equivalence. In September 2003, Howard Dean, who became Chairman of the Democratic National Committee, stated that the US should not “take sides” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Actually, the refusal to draw a bright line against Palestinian terrorism is a major factor that enabled 9/11 and other terrorist atrocities.

    Susan Turnbull, Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee, referred to the killing of terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as murder. Follow this link and you can hear it for yourself. Yes, she corrected herself and changed it to the “bombing” of Zarqawi. However: As far as I can tell, Turnbull is a native speaker of the English language. And I don’t think any native English speaker would use the term “murdered” unless they disapproved of what had been done. Certainly, few Americans during WWII would have referred to the “murder” of Admiral Yamamoto (whose plane was shot down after his movement plans became known via communications intercepts) or the “murder” of German war criminals who were executed after the war.

    Many individuals, particularly among religious leaders, show a stunning naivete. Annika quotes from a homily at a church in her neighborhood: “What if, instead of bombing Afghanistan, we had dropped food, medicine and education?”

    How could anyone with an IQ above refrigerator temperature say such a thing? Even if education could somehow be “dropped,” isn’t this priest aware that the Taliban specifically denied education to women, and greatly limited the kinds of education that were available to men? Does he think the Taliban’s executions at the soccer stadium, or its destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas, were motivated by a desire for food and medicine?

    People who say such things are so caught up in the catch-phrases they have been taught that they are completely unable to understand the real motivations of the enemy.

    Bryan Preston: Rather than accept the reality of an enemy that cannot and therefore will not negotiate away what he believes to be the will of God, and rather than accept that this enemy will understand nothing outside total victory or total defeat, and rather than understand that this enemy’s goals include enslaving the entire world in a global caliphate, and rather than accept that this reality necessitates the use of all tools including military might to defend ourselves, millions have embraced an alternate reality. The reality of the enemy outside the West and its motivations being too terrifying and too far beyond their own control, millions now imagine that the enemy in this war is within. The enemy, to them, isn’t the turbaned man behind the plot to hijack multiple airplanes and crash them into multiple buildings in America. The real enemy, to these millions, is the man in the Oval Office, and the man or men behind him.

    and

    Five years on, the illness of replacing an implacable, indeed alien enemy with one from our own civilizational family has spread and metastasized through the majority of one of our two political parties, and may yet claim a majority of the country itself. History has a way of fading out as the day’s current noise rises in volume, and to them 9-11 is either history or a historic lie. The loudest voice, though not always or even often right, is often the one that gets the last word. And the 9-11 deniers and their allies across the left are nothing if not loud.

    Five years on, it’s hard to take a positive look at the war because we are failing to comprehend it. The mass denial of reality is taking half our arsenal of unity and morale away from us. Those of us who see the threat for what it is still say that we will prevail because we are right and because we are America, but that’s just letting the others off the hook. If we’re going to prevail anyway, why should they snap out of their fog? And why should we demand that they do? The truth is, we need the denial to end and we need our countrymen to understand and help, but since we’re powerless to cure it with reason we shrug or laugh at it. But it’s eating away at our ability to defend ourselves.

    It has to be said: The mass denial of reality is taking half our arsenal of unity and morale away from us. We are not dealing here merely with normal differences about policy that can be debated by rational individuals. We are have in our midst a significant number of individuals who are filled with rage toward their own country, who are highly susceptible to bizarre conspiracy theories, who lack any form of historical perspective, who are increasingly eager to engage in scapegoating.

    In 2006, I visited an old industrial facility that has been restored to operating condition. One of the machines there, dating from around 1900, was called an attrition mill. It contains two steel discs, which rotate at high speed in opposite directions, crushing the kernels of grain between them.

    I fear that our civilization is caught in a gigantic attrition mill, with one disc being the terrorist enemy, and the other being the reality-deniers within our own societies.

    Links worth following:

    Neo-Neocon

    Fearless Dream

    Roger L Simon

    A post by Jane Galt, written six months after 9/11, when she was volunteering at the World Trade Center site.

    A worthwhile essay at The American Thinker: The Moral Emptiness of the Left.

    Reflecting Light has some eloquent words.

    Lead and Gold has links, excerpts, and reflections, all of which are well worth reading.

    Neptunus Lex was operations officer on an aircraft carrier when the news came in. Read the comments, too.

    UPDATES FOR 2008:Cara Ellison has pictures and a story.

    Here is some very depressing survey data about international beliefs regarding 9/11. In Italy, for example, 15% of the people surveyed believed that the U.S. government was behind the attacks. In Egypt, 12% said that the attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. government, while 43% blamed Israel.

    UPDATES FOR 2009: Ryan Mauro ask are we getting complacent about terror? Ralph Peters believes that the answer to this question is clearly “yes.” (via PowerLine)

    UPDATES FOR 2010: Chicago Boy James Rummel compares the psychological impact of the current threat with that of the Cold War prospect of nuclear annihilation. Cara Ellison has a piece that is short, very personal, and beautifully written. For context, see her earlier post here.

    Something Cara wrote last year…

    I guess I thought they were all gone, those types of monsters, stranded on reels of black and white film

    ..inspired me to write this post: Black storm clouds and brilliant lightning flashes.

    Additional Update: Neptunus Lex

     

    7 Responses to “9/11 Plus Nine Years”

    1. John Burgess Says:

      I find that both the ‘9/10’ and the ‘9/12’ folks are becoming unhinged. There is little discourse, only bitter harangues and odious demagoguery, from both sides of the political spectrum. Reason does not prevail when arguments are made on the basis of feelings and emotion.

      I only hope that what I see now is only PTSD following the trauma of 9/11.

    2. renminbi Says:

      There is an interesting link on the proposed “mosque” being contemplated for ground zero:

      http://www.nypost.com/columnists/amirtaheri

      Count on the MSM to get it wrong almost always-the NY Post is to be commended for this.

    3. David Foster Says:

      Renminbi…direct link to the article I think you’re referring to is here.

    4. Michael Kennedy Says:

      This is more of the war against the “governing class” who see every third worlder as an honorable individual and every American (except his or her own friends) as a thoughtless drudge worth only the taxes they pay. The people who defend Islam as a “religion of peace” are hiding under the covers of their own moral squeamishness.

      I get a daily leftist (mild, I think) newsletter called The Daily Beast. I think it is run by Tina Brown. This is what they are preoccupied with. I don’t think they have any idea that their superficial lives could be ended in an instant by someone who does not have any interest in fashion or art or music. It simply does not occur to them.

    5. David Foster Says:

      Cassandra: Two Americas

    6. David Foster Says:

      Frank Salvato:

      “Yet today, nine years later, we have elected as our leaders sympathizers and appeasers who are using the Iraqi and Afghan battle theaters as pawns in an ideological political game; who call the war against aggressive, radical and violent Islam an “overseas contingency plan”; and who do practically everything in their power to undercut the West’s most valuable ally in the Middle East – Israel – short of attacking her themselves.”

    7. David Foster Says:

      Two more 9/11-related links:

      Mary Grabar has a very disturbing post about what she observed on 9/11 as a grad student in English at an American university. I would like the believe that–even in academia, even in a humanities department–Mary’s story is an outlier, but I’m not totally sure it is.

      (via Newmark’s Door)

      Cassandra, who among other things is a Marine wife, has a message for President Obama.

      (via Little Miss Attila)