Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Does Anybody Here Think This is Really a Good Idea?

    Posted by David Foster on April 8th, 2018 (All posts by )

    From a community college catalog:

    STEM for Infants and Toddlers.  In this course we will discuss what STEM means and the importance of STEM exposure in the early years of a child’s development.  We will explore developmentally appropriate strategies and activities to build a foundation in STEM learning for infants and toddlers.

    Click Here To Save $15 at Ammo.com
     

    12 Responses to “Does Anybody Here Think This is Really a Good Idea?”

    1. Jeff Carter Says:

      you can never radicalize them too young when you are a hard leftist-and you do it under the cloak of something that seems reasonable. BTW, did you see the Obama Institute for Radicalization that is being built in Chicago on 20 acres of public park land? No library there (wait, a Chicago Public Library) So, no research. Just a place to radicalize the youth for another run at Freedom and Liberty.

    2. T. Wolter Says:

      Well its not for every kid but there are some…. one of my sons had as his first word “broken”, and got a sledgehammer for his third birthday. He was building battlebots in grade school and ended up an engineer designing robotic assembly equipment. He’s kind of a Mutant, but there are a few out there…….
      T

    3. David Foster Says:

      TW…question is, would an attempt to proactively teach him STEM have made any positive difference, a negative difference, or no difference at all, in his STEM interests and accomplishments? Sounds like he’s done just fine without such…

    4. Gringo Says:

      The only problem here is that little boys who orient towards trucks- learning laws of motion etc. – will be discouraged from doing so because it is so sexist for a little boy to like trucks.
      They want to encourage STEM stuff for girls but discourage them for boys,I suspect.

    5. Assistant Village Idiot Says:

      We did some of this with our young children, as fanatic educators. The Montessori method includes lots of STEM-friendly stuff. Math Manipulables, I recall. I don’t know that it much matters. Put building, math, computer, and science stuff out there, but I wouldn’t force it too hard.

    6. Brian Says:

      My guess is this is aimed at day care workers, who need to acquire education credits to both start and continue working. Teachers and childcare workers are incredibly credentialed nowadays, though they don’t appear to be any more educated or effective than 100 years ago. The primary beneficiaries are of course education institutions that collect tuition for all of these classes.

      Also, the fact is that parents love this stuff. If you can’t tell them why their 6 month old will be in a STEM-friendly environment, you may as well not even bother.

    7. David Foster Says:

      This strikes me as a bad idea. Kids in that age range need to be engaging in free play, not be subjected to the direction of a parent or day-care worker who is trying to apply some theory they learned in a classroom.

    8. Ginny Says:

      Almost anything that comes from an education theorist is a bad idea.

      My three daughters were Montessori trained, too – they all went into languages, social sciences, etc. My sister’s son during those years was different. She told me that the teacher was worried when he pounded his hand with a hammer meant to hammer pegs (I don’t know if it was Montessori or not). She told the teacher that was because he wanted to prove for himself what happened – his father was an engineer. Her son is a gifted (and quite social) engineer, now in grad school and with grants under his belt (in one project when he was a freshman he was the only one with a full security clearance – since no one else was a citizen – we might think what that means about our future and American engineering). Surely the differences between our children has something to do with their genders and something to do with the husbands we chose (I chose one from Engl grad school; my sister chose one from the Ag engineers whose prose she smoothed to make for public consumption; she and I were Engl majors, our father an engineer.)

      But surely encouraging interests in math and science in even those not likely to like them is not a bad idea – my grandson takes delight in what numbers do, finding “backwards multiplication” as interesting as the tables he enjoys so much he is teaching his friends that joy. But, like I said, never think that education theorists have the best of intentions nor the most productive of methods. (Okay, that may be prejudice but I’m pretty old and its experience as well.)

    9. Mrs. Davis Says:

      Are they going to use one of those 7 ft long slide rules?

    10. T. Wolter Says:

      David
      A belated answer. No, I think a combination of hard wiring and what the kids had on hand to play with set them well into their eventual paths. I suppose intervention could have done something, be it good or ill. For instance, my wife insisted that our three boys have one baby doll in the house. To be modern and sensitive and all. “Baby Mike” ended up being used as a hammer when they were little, and as a crash test dummy for parachute experiments a few years later. I suppose I could have put the kibosh on that sort of thing had I been sufficiently de-educated in the new ways….
      T. Wolter

    11. PenGun Says:

      My daughter loved her block and hammer toy but was frustrated by it. I was a roofer at the time and so I started 20 odd nails into firewood beside the stove and gave her a small hammer. She loved this, demanded more, and is a serious artist today.

      ;)

    12. Tonestaple Says:

      Daddy was a mathematician. Although we all did well in math in school, none of us girls went that way. And we all ended up being more musical than average. And my daughter ends up being a professional musician, and my grandsons are STEM-inclined. One just never knows how these influences are going to pop out.

      Daughter’s adoptive parents, God bless them forever, encouraged her to try what she wanted to try, and she ended up in music.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.