Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • A Visual Impression of the Democratic Debate

    Posted by Jonathan on August 1st, 2019 (All posts by )

    double trouble

     

    9 Responses to “A Visual Impression of the Democratic Debate”

    1. Grurray Says:

      Appropriately stone-faced Tulsi is just getting started defending California stoners from the torments of former DA Kamala Harris. Her advisers should inform her that you catch more flies with honey than vinegar and suggest revving up some of that surfer charm.

    2. Brian Says:

      The fact that we now have permanent campaigns for emperor, I mean president, is the ultimate sign of American decadence. Also the most destructive influence of 24 hour “news” channels.

      Almost none of these people are seriously running for president, they’re just trying to raise their name profile, and now they can call themselves “presidential candidate” when they try to move up the chain in politics and/or media.

    3. OBloodyHell Says:

      Almost none of these people are seriously running for president, they’re just trying to raise their name profile, and now they can call themselves “presidential candidate” when they try to move up the chain in politics and/or media.

      Not precisely. They also want to
      1) learn the ropes
      2) get experience assembling a team
      3) Get name recognition for when they have a serious chance of winning in some future election.
      4) Hoping they can get the booby prize of Veep, as Veeps are always serious front-runners for subsequent elections.

      In that sense, they are doing “the right thing”. That they are clearly doing it the wrong way, and locking themselves into a quick tap dancing two-step in some future timeframe when the idiocy they are pushing today is ill-thought of is not particularly smart.

    4. Felton Neurolithicum Says:

      Gabbard is running to be Biden’s VP. Because that is an achievable goal. It may work. She is smarter than most of these people.

      Harris the anointed choice of the D establishment. If Harris starts to disintegrate, expect them to push forward the Black woman they really want to run — Michelle Obama.

    5. Gavin Longmuir Says:

      I have respectfully to disagree with Felton — the Clown Circus is deliberate on the part of the real movers & shakers of the Democrat Establishment. And the Democrats have no real interest in Americans of African heritage, female or male, except as a club to beat cowering Republicans. Every one of these Democrats in the contest has skeletons in the closet which the Democrat Establishment will leak to the Democrat media as & when required — all to prepare for the eventual triumphant return by mass acclamation of the candidate the Establishment really wants: Hillary Rodham Clinton.

      Of course, it is quite possible that, by the time this happens, Billy Clinton will have been Epsteined and a divorced Hillary will run as Ms. Rodham — the answer to a nation’s prayers.

    6. Grurray Says:

      The DNC has changed permanently to an urban party of gender fluidity & neo-Chavezism. There isn’t even any pretense of appealing to anyone outside the top dozen or so metropolitan areas. Given that we still have an Electoral College, either the nominee has to be Biden or they must have to be cooking up some scheme for stealing the election.

    7. OBloodyHell Says:

      The Bee is on a roll…

      https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fbabylonbee.com%2Fnews%2Fsnopes-issues-pre-approval-on-all-statements-made-during-tonights-democratic-debate

    8. OBloodyHell Says:

      @$%&@%$$%@$&#%^*%^# Facebook and their @#$#$% retarded links.

      >:-/

      https://babylonbee.com/news/snopes-issues-pre-approval-on-all-statements-made-during-tonights-democratic-debate

    9. Anonymous Says:

      Thanks for the Bee link, LMAO.

      Death6

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.