Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • New Frontiers in Offshoring

    Posted by David Foster on September 6th, 2020 (All posts by )

    Babysitting…of kids in Japan, via Zoom, by women in Rwanda.

    Relates to my posts telemigration and Covid-19, Remote Work, and Offshoring.



    7 Responses to “New Frontiers in Offshoring”

    1. Gavin Longmuir Says:

      Who cleans up the mess when baby throws up? Interested parties want to know!

    2. David Foster Says:

      I think it’s for somewhat older children…either while their parents are out of the house, or just to get a half hour or so of time away from the kids. Would not be a good idea with an actual baby.

    3. Gavin Longmuir Says:

      It is not obvious that this would work any better with older kids — kids who stick their fingers in electrical sockets or spill boiling water or invite their girlfriends over while their parents are out for the evening.

      You are undoubtedly correct about earlier speculations that anything which can be done effectively as Work From Home will quickly become Work From Manila. Actual babysitting may be one of the last things left for former Western office workers to earn some cash.

      Free Trade! It is an unalloyed good!

    4. David Foster Says:

      This will probably be only a niche business…but if it were to succeed on a large scale, it would drive down the wages of Japanese babysitters and also have some positive effect on the wages of the Rwandan women.

      Also, of course, there is income potential for smart intermediaries: in this case, the Japanese woman who thought of the idea (while being on-site in Rwanda) and, more indirectly, the employees and shareholders of Zoom.

    5. MCS Says:

      I think baby sitting may be a bit of an exaggeration. What I saw in the article was more along the lines of entertainment/enrichment with a sort of cross-cultural aspect. I can’t imagine the parent or in person care giver was very far away, especially in Japan. It’s got to beat sitting the kid down with a Power Ranger video.

      The aspect I found most interesting was that there was enough cheap bandwidth in Rwanda for it to work. Also a Japanese restaurant in Kigali.

      I’m probably handicapped by never having a job that could possibly be done remotely. I really have trouble imagining what all those people stacked in skyscrapers in places like New York actually do to earn their paychecks. Businesses that produce tangible objects have already been flattened pretty far compared to 50 years ago. All of the clerks and secretaries that used to do timekeeping and payroll or correspondence are gone. Most of those functions are already farmed out.

      I worked in a plant that had 50-60 employees, there was exactly one manager and one bookkeeper, everyone else was either production or maintenance.

      Businesses that produce intangibles like software are different. Some organizations use the time difference between widely separated teams to do things like test code written during the day overnight. Usually wide east-west separation is a hindrance.

      There’s a tendency to classify anyone with a white collar job as a knowledge worker. Just like everywhere else, there are unskilled, semiskilled and skilled knowledge workers. The lower levels are fungible, the upper level not so much.

    6. David Foster Says:

      MCS…”I worked in a plant that had 50-60 employees, there was exactly one manager and one bookkeeper, everyone else was either production or maintenance.”

      No production schedulers, expeditors, etc? Or are you counting those under Production?

    7. MCS Says:

      The manager and bookkeeper/accountant took care of most of that. I left out the head QC. It was somewhat simplified in that we only produced two items and we were a branch of a corporation that had a slightly less abbreviated management apparatus elsewhere.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.