Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Movie Review: The Current War

    Posted by David Foster on November 1st, 2019 (All posts by )

    This movie is focused on the interaction among Thomas Edison, George Westinghouse, and Nikola Tesla in the competition to create and build out America’s…and the world’s…electrical infrastructure.  It has gotten mixed and generally not-very-enthusiastic reviews; I thought it was well-done and definitely worth seeing.  Visually, it is striking and sometimes even beautiful, thus worth seeing on the big screen.

    The movie gets the outline of the history right; also, I think, the essence of the characters.  Edison is a brilliant inventor and self-promoter who is committed to his DC-based distribution system and will do some more-than-questionable things to get it universally adopted.  Westinghouse, who had invented the railroad air brake (among other things) and already built a large company, sees the value of alternating current, which can be stepped up and down in voltage via transformers and hence can be economically transmitted over long distances.  Tesla, a Serbian immigrant and brilliant inventor, provides the missing link in the form of a practical motor that can run on AC power.  The relationships of Edison and Westinghouse with their respective wives are highlighted, and the future utility mogul Samuel Insull appears as Edison’s young secretary.

    I was happy to see the movie’s positive portrayal of Westinghouse, a great man who has tended to be overshadowed by the more-glamorous figures of Edison and Tesla.  (The legions of Tesla fans may be unhappy that Tesla did not get a more central role in the film.)

    If this movie sounds interesting to you, better see it soon; I don’t think it’s going to be in the theaters for very long.

     

    20 Responses to “Movie Review: The Current War

    1. Mike K Says:

      Insull was rather unfairly made out to be a major villain. He was an entrepreneur and introduced the electrical appliances that made the 20s the equivalent of the 90s in innovation. Like many entrepreneurs, he lost control of the finances and died broke. Sadly, he took a lot of investors down too but so did the stock market,.

    2. David Foster Says:

      Mike K, I just downloaded the Kindle free sample for a book about Insull. Looks interesting enough to read the whole thing. A little political ridiculousness from the author in the introduction, though.

    3. David Foster Says:

      One of Edison’s main strategies in his battle against AC was to argue that it was too *dangerous* to be allowed.

      If today’s political-social environment had existed back then, he would have probably gotten away with it.

    4. MCS Says:

      I suspect a lot of Edison’s hostility to alternating current was the math it takes to design the machinery and especially a stable distribution system. I don’t think that math was in Edison’s wheel house. The small DC systems that could be built could be analyzed with nothing more than Ohm’s Law like the telegraph system.

    5. David Foster Says:

      MCS…I’ve had the same thought. AC is a lot more abstract and math-intensive than is DC.

      Of course, Edison could have hired and relied on other people to do the analysis, but I don’t think that was the way he was wired.

    6. Whitehall Says:

      I’ll second the biography of Insull. Very interesting and capable business man. You’ll see portions of his personal story (the opera singer as wife) in “Citizen Kane” too.

      Yes, AC power math is much more complex, making extensive use of imaginary numbers.

      Tesla was working on the problem of AC power systems for months with great difficulty and frustration, then one day took his lunch time walk in the park.

      He awoke on his back in the grass after sundown with the complete theory worked out. A classic “brain storm” that seems to have taken hours to reorganize the brain neurons.

      I had one once, while working on a nuclear design issue. Mine was over in about 15 seconds but it was startling in its profundity. I count myself lucky.

      I’ll definitely look out for the movie.

    7. CapitalistRoader Says:

      AC versus DC load breaking comparison with a knife switch

    8. David Foster Says:

      Tesla’s own story of the invention of the AC motor:

      One afternoon, which is ever present in my recollection, I was enjoying a walk with my friend in the city park and reciting poetry. At that age I knew entire books by heart, word for word. One of these was Goethe’s Faust. The sun was just setting and reminded me of a glorious passage:

      The glow retreats, done is the day of toil;
      It yonder hastes, new fields of life exploring;
      Ah, that no wing can lift me from the soil
      Upon its track to follow, follow soaring!

      As I uttered these inspiring words the idea came like a flash of lightning and in an instant the truth was revealed. I drew with a stick on the sand the diagram shown six years later in my address before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

      Maybe could have been an interesting visual, in the form of a dream sequence, in the movie.

      (I’ve seen the story challenged, on grounds of the friend’s recollection and other factors)

    9. OBloodyHell Says:

      I also will recommend

      Tesla, Man Out of Time
      by Margaret Cheney
      https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005WKF97C

      I will grant it borders, at time, on hagiography, but it’s an interesting overview of his life and accomplishments, and his failures.

      His biggest error was in surrendering his patents to Westinghouse and not getting a paper restructuring of their obligations. While all indications are, Westinghouse was an utterly honorable man who would have treated Tesla correct, the latter part of his life, Westinghouse was gone, and he almost certainly should have been treated much better by the corporate entity that followed. Tesla could have broken the company if he’d been greedy, but wasn’t. And, had he played the cards right, Tesla might have been set for a decent R&D budget for the rest of his life, too.

      Tesla was one of those incredibly unstable geniuses, who really needed a minder. A dutiful wife, a great friend, someone, to watch out for him and his interests as a human would, could, and should, but Tesla was somewhat unable to do.

    10. David Foster Says:

      OBH….Westinghouse paid Tesla $60,000 cash plus a $2.50/hp royalty, with a $15K yearly minimum. Apparently when George W ran into financial trouble, he approached Tesla and said something would have to give, leading Tesla to tear up the royalty agreement because he wanted the business and AC power to succeed. If I’m reading the Wikipedia entry right (and if it’s correct), Westinghouse later paid Tesla $216K for full ownership of the patent.

      Given that the inflation rate since then is at least 30:1, the cash payments equate to $1.8 million and $6.3 million respectively. Certainly not anywhere near what the AC motor was worth, but not trivial numbers either….the meme that Tesla was never paid for his inventions really isn’t true.

      Westinghouse probably would have been happy with a stretch out or reduction of the royalty terms; I believe he was surprised when Tesla just tore up the deal.

    11. MCS Says:

      If the load had been a motor in the video, there would have been a little more snap when opening the AC circuit. You generally have to use special switches with high energy DC that have a magnetic field to blow out the arc.

      My father was in the power station in Colorado Springs that was damaged during one of Tesla’s experiments with wireless power transmission.

      I still vividly remember watching a 568KV switch open from the door of a substation when I was about 6-7. It was AC, of course, but it still drew a 16′ arc. I was probably about 100′ away.

    12. Whitehall Says:

      I’ve worked at the legacy companies (nuclear) of both men – Westinghouse and Edison (General Electric.) Both founders are still revered within their respective children. The Founders’ photos line the walls; stories are shared.

      Interesting in how the corporate cultures differ too. In sports analogies, Westinghouse plays full back, making big, fast moves. General Electric is a defensive line, biggest on the field and they know it.

      Both companies have a nickname for their corporate logo. General Electric puts its “meatball” on its products. Westinghouse is more cowboy and goes by “the Circle Bar W.”

    13. Joe Wooten Says:

      Whitehall,

      Are you still at Westinghouse? I got caught in the train wreck in August 2017.

    14. Whitehall Says:

      Mr. Wooten,

      Same here but I had just been vested in my pension, which was most generous.

      I’ve moved on and I’m now in a happy job in a busy but hot and sandy place. I’m pretty much “Mr. Spent Fuel Pool.”

    15. Mrs. Davis Says:

      Saw the movie last night. A good but not great effort. This movie (without all the special effects) could have been made in 1939. No cursing, no nudity, no violence. Just a good old fashioned story.

      The fact that it was made is what is amazing about this film.

      Why was it made? The producers, which these days I suspect means the big investors, were

      Adam Ackland … executive producer
      Garrett Basch … executive producer
      Timur Bekmambetov … producer
      Benedict Cumberbatch … executive producer
      Basil Iwanyk … producer
      Michael Mitnick … executive producer
      Matthew Patnick … line producer
      Ann Ruark … executive producer
      Martin Scorsese … executive producer
      Adam Sidman … executive producer
      Jayne Sullivan … co-producer
      Georgette Turner … Line Producer: Additional Photography
      Bob Weinstein … executive producer
      Michele Wolkoff … executive producer
      Steven Zaillian … executive producer
      Harvey Weinstein … producer (uncredited)

      Scorsese, Weinstein, and Cumberbatch are some big names. IMDB estimates it cost $30 million. That’s a lot of money and power to put into such a classical movie. At Rotten Tomatoes critics give it 62% but audiences 80%. Is this an indication of a shift in the culture of Hollywood? And politics is down wind from culture.

    16. OBloodyHell Says:

      }}} Certainly not anywhere near what the AC motor was worth, but not trivial numbers either….the meme that Tesla was never paid for his inventions really isn’t true.

      Westinghouse probably would have been happy with a stretch out or reduction of the royalty terms; I believe he was surprised when Tesla just tore up the deal.

      Oh, Agreed. As I suggest, Westinghouse’s dealing with Tesla were totally honorable. And I’m not even saying Tesla got screwed in any regard.

      I’m saying he was not the smartest man in the business sense, and could have, at the least, been set for life, and, had he had a “minder” (i.e., a wife, a friend, anyone) who would look over his shoulder and make sure his own interests were watched out for, he would never have been destitute or bordering on it later on, and likely would always have had a substantial R&D budget available for his studies (never the amount he wished for, I am sure).

      Everything “bad” that happened was entirely his own fault, but it ties to the oddness connected to his genius. Face it, the guy was OCD fastidious and yet he was in love with a pigeon. Literally in love. Pigeons are rats with wings.

      He could have struck a decent balance between surrendering it all and breaking the company, but did not.

      As to the movie, I just saw it last night. I am currently (ar ar) in the process of reading the book it is based on. It’s pretty, but it misses so much of the undercurrent of what was happening, and many other actors are not mentioned. This leads to Edison, et al, becoming too thin in characterization. It also puts J.P. Morgan front and center, while reducing Tesla to even less of a role than he has in the book, where the first 3/5ths of the book barely mentions JP. All understood as related to the limits of a movie, but it leads to a certain emptiness of the justifications of the characters’ motivations, and a dramatic emphasis about same that does not show up in the book at all (there’s little mention of Edison’s wife’s issues in that same 3/5ths).

      Cumberbatch and Holland are somewhat wasted in their parts, particularly Holland. Holland is basically just there as a true believer and for moral support for Edison, and that’s all. Anyone could have done this, it did not need an actor of any stature. And Cumberbatch is not greatly suited for the role — Edison is not obnoxious enough (and probably wasn’t) for his best performances.

      But yes, the visuals of the era are lush and opulent — perhaps a bit too CLEAN — you don’t see the true tangle of wires, nor the filth of 1880 Pittsburgh, both of which are prominent in the actual course of events (many of the early accidental electrocutions occurred as a result of the wire tangle (the wires generally shown are all neat and tidy arrangements), and the smog of Pittsburgh was a problem for many, including Tesla. And in its desire to be “beautiful”, it glosses over, with merely a headline, the electrocution of Kemmler.

      All in all, I recommend the book far far more than the movie. I think it sat in limbo for far longer simply because it really just doesn’t quite work. It’s worth seeing, but don’t expect too much from it.

    17. Bill Brandt Says:

      I enjoyed the movie. Wasn’t what I would call entertaining but informative. And together with the book Devil In The White City didn’t realize how important the 1893 Chicago Worlds Fair was in this battle. Didn’t know about the electric chair angle.

    18. Bill Brandt Says:

      Also I was surprised that it was made in 2017 but not released until now!

    19. Joe Wooten Says:

      Whitehall,

      I saw it coming and was prepared and now happily working for a small consulting company from home. I was also “retired” but did not start drawing the pension yet. I wanted to work a few more years first.

      Did you know Marty Zegar?

    20. David Foster Says:

      Bill…”Also I was surprised that it was made in 2017 but not released until now!”

      Had to do with Weinstein’s involvement.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.