Correction on Jesse Jackson Jr, but pretty much the same…

In this post I photographed a black SUV with congressional plates in the Gold Coast and said it was Jesse Jackson Jr’s.

In fact, it is from the first congressional district (the “1” I guess, now in hindsight that is obvious) and it is Bobby Rush’s.

Like Jesse Jackson Jr., Bobby Rush is a lockstep Democrat, voting for all of the environmental programs and it is very surprising that such an individual would go for a giant, expensive gas guzzling SUV when their party wants all of America to get into a tiny, fuel efficient economy car. But principles are for the “little people”, not those in power, right?

As far as Jesse Jackson Jr – it is TRUE (according to this post on the Channel 5 blog, a local news channel, so presumably a pretty reliable source) that he doesn’t drive a Lincoln Navigator – but he drives a FORD EXPEDITION.

Bizarrely enough, Mr. Jackson must not be much of a negotiator, because he is paying $1161 / month for a Ford Expedition while Bobby Rush pays $746 / month for a Lincoln Navigator, both 2007 models. He is paying much more to lease the less expensive model. According to MSN, the 2007 Ford Expedition retailed for between $29,000 and $39,000 depending on option packages, while the 2007 Lincoln Navigator retailed for between $45,000 and $51,000.

Using the midpoint of the price range, the Lincoln Navigator costs 41% MORE than the Ford Expedition, and yet Bobby Rush is paying 36% LESS than Mr. Jackson. Very odd.

But to get back to the heart of the matter – as anyone who knows anything about cars understands, the Lincoln Navigator and the Ford Expedition are ESSENTIALLY THE SAME TRUCK. The Ford Expedition weighs around 6,000 pounds, and the Lincoln Navigator weighs around 6,000 pounds. According to the NBC 5 blog post, the Lincoln Navigator actually gets BETTER gas mileage, too, although they are both terrible, as anyone who owns one can attest.

But Jesse Jackson Jr. wasn’t hanging out in the Gold Coast instead of hanging in their neighborhood with their own constituents, Bobby Rush was. He is about 18 miles out of Evergreen Park. After all, why hang out with those that elect you in the first place.

SO, in conclusion:
– I was wrong, Jesse Jackson Jr. doesn’t drive a Lincoln Navigator and wasn’t hanging out in the Gold Coast Friday night
– BUT Jesse Jackson Jr. does drive ESSENTIALLY the same car, a giant gas-guzzling SUV of the type his Democratic party routinely condemns, according to our local news station (see link above)
– Jesse Jackson Jr. doesn’t appear to be much of a negotiator, either, at least compared to his other gas-guzzling hypocritical Democratic congressional brethren

Mayor Quimby (commenter) – care to comment from the US House of Representatives on why someone who votes 100% with environmental causes drives a huge, gas-guzzling SUV, essentially identical to the one that I said he drove in the original post?

Cross posted at LITGM

The Beast in the — Airport?

A recurring theme in this forum … David Baron, call your office: Deer enters, runs around KCI’s Terminal A (Kansas City Star).

Maybe it was running from a mountain lion (“Mountain lions are now fairly common in suburban areas of California and have recently been sighted as far east as urban Kansas City, Missouri, where several have been hit by cars.”).

I could live well on the venison from deer that have wandered through my yard if I could 1) dispatch them quietly and 2) field-dress them without attracting attention.

“Life After People”: Environmentalist Porn

My son and I like to watch “Life After People” on The History Channel. The show is a thought experiment that examines what would happen to man-made structures and nature if humans suddenly  disappeared while leaving everything otherwise intact.  

I like the show but one thing about watching it creeps me out.  

Read more

Oil Tanker Saves Environmentalists

From my spouse who observes that we should, “File this under things you can’t make up,” a BBC story:

An expedition team which set sail from Plymouth on a 5,000-mile carbon emission-free trip to Greenland have been rescued by an oil tanker.

I’m presuming that the ship in the story is the one described on this website. I don’t think that they got in trouble primarily due to their unpowered “carbon-free” ship. I think they got in trouble primarily because they took a small sailing yacht into arctic waters. They might have gotten into trouble even if they used 21st Century technology to drive their ship. On the other hand, having even a small engine on board that did not depend on a tranquil environment in order to function most likely would have kept them  from capsizing.

This little  humorous  incident highlights a serious problem with wind and solar power that I have written about before. Wind and solar systems harvest low-density ambient energy. This requires that their  transducers, the mechanisms that convert the ambient energy into  electricity, must be very large, lightweight and exposed to all the forces of nature. This exposure in turn makes the systems very  susceptible  to damage from environmental extremes.  

To highlight this fact, Let’s compare two ships on the technological extremes: a pure sailing ship such as a clipper ship and a nuclear submarine.

Read more

Texas Just Builds

From a  Max Schulz article on California’s failing environmental and energy polices:

And Texas, of all places, has outpaced California as America’s leader in wind-power generation. High costs, excessive regulation, and litigation from environmental groups on how to limit bird deaths have all hampered California’s effort; Texas has just built lots of wind turbines.

We just build things in Texas. Wind turbines, solar power plants, off-shore turbines, coal-powered plants, transmission lines, pipelines of all sorts, you name it and we just build it with apparently only a tenth as much gnashing of teeth as places like California.  

Read more