Acknowledging the E.U.

In a post below, Ralf Goergens asks:

“The European Union is the biggest and wealthiest continous trade zone in the world…The EU is thereby spreading rule of law and democracy ever wider eastwards…why don’t I see anyone in the so-called ‘Anglosphere’ acknowledging this success story, instead of endlessly obsessing about its faults?”

I think the problem results from differing cultural perceptions as to what constitutes a significant success and what does not. The differences are especially severe between America and continental Europe.

Read more

Amnesty Travesty II

(Part I is here.)

As Charles at LGF would put it: Amnesty International reaches bottom, digs.

Their website now features “USA: Betraying human rights
Information for journalists related to the US reaction to the Amnesty International Report 2005.” The first item in this press information package is a video interview on the subject of Guantanamo with none other than Noam Chomsky. What, was Osama bin Laden not available?

Germany Revisits Big Lie Theory

It’s been said that Hitler gained support for his anti-Semitic programs by appealing to a sense of conspiracy: He suggested that Jews were so fantastically nefarious that they were obviously behind the downfall of the Kaiser’s Reich. His pronouncement on the technique can even be seen on this PBS page:

Equally important was his theory that a big lie is always better than a little one because the masses “more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie.”

In this same spirit, the current German government, through the provenance of its own PBS analog, ARD, is now promulgating the very big lie that the “Bush Family orchestrated the 9/11 attacks.” We get the goods through Davids Medienkritik.

Readers here know what I think about conspiracy theories. The German public broadcaster’s conspiracy theory is debunked all over the place, but a particularly authoritative source is to be found at Popular Mechanics, which conducts said debunking quite thoroughly and scientifically. In the editorial introduction, the editors warn:

These 9/11 conspiracy theories, long popular abroad, are gradually–though more quietly–seeping into mainstream America. Allegations of U.S. complicity in the attacks have become standard fare on talk radio and among activists on both the extreme left and the extreme right of the political spectrum.

Don’t get me wrong: Healthy skepticism is a good thing. Nobody should take everything they hear–from the government, the media or anybody else–at face value. But in a culture shaped by Oliver Stone movies and “X-Files” episodes, it is apparently getting harder for simple, hard facts to hold their own against elaborate, shadowy theorizing.

The “Greatest Generation” fought a noble war to free a continent from the boot of a dictator who employed the Big Lie to further his conspiracy theory-driven agenda. Just because Germany is no longer among the greatest powers, just because she is no military threat to anyone, doesn’t mean that the insidiousness of these invidious allegations will do no harm. It is furthermore appalling that such bald lies are being aired on government-subsidized television.

If it were just on private television, then I’d say, great, the best way to fight abuse of the freedom of speech, is to counter with better speech. But it is certainly not helpful that Germany, of all countries, should be engaging in this sort of rumor-mongering.

All the more reason not to buy overpriced German cars.

[Cross-posted at Between Worlds]

Non-activist judges strike again

In Gonzales v. Raich, a bit of judicial activism would have been constitutionally correct and would have also increased our liberties, but the judges took a pass and went with the will of the majority.

For precedent, they relied on Wicard v. Filburn, or the “Every move you make affects interstate commerce” decision from the New Deal era.

Finding a right to abortion tucked away in a penumbra might be a stretch. Finding, nearly 150 years after the fact, that a single line in a list of enumerated powers grants Congress unlimited authority over the people and renders the entire rest of the list completely redundant and insignificant is… well, whatever it is, the abortion penumbra pales to insignificance, nay complete invisibility next to it.

Seriously, under any theory of Constitutional interpretation that doesn’t assume that the Founders were all higher than a treeful of monkeys on nitrous oxide, can anyone possibly conclude that any rational interpretation of a list of enumerated powers could find this meaning:

Congress shall have power

– to do A
– to do B
– to do C

– to do R
– to pass any other laws concerning any activity whatsoever including growing vegetables in your backyard, given that anything you do might affect someone’s decision to buy or sell something across state lines.

All you folks screaming about Bush’s supposed efforts to destroy civil liberties should note that the Democrats are the ones employing every tool they can get their hands on to preserve this sort of jurisprudence, and Bush is the one trying to inject a few judges that see the New Deal reasoning as the thinly-veiled power grab it is. (Of course, in your world, it seems that “civil liberties” don’t apply to Americans buying stuff and selling stuff, but only to Muslims allegedly trying to blow up stuff. Which do you think is a greater threat to society?)